Fatskills
Practice. Master. Repeat.
Study Guide: Intro to Organizational Behavior (OB): Organizational Culture and Change - Functions and Dysfunctions of Culture, Integration Adaptability Barrier to Change Barrier to Diversity
Source: https://www.fatskills.com/organizational-behavior/chapter/organizational-behavior-ob-organizational-culture-and-change-functions-and-dysfunctions-of-culture-integration-adaptability-barrier-to-change-barrier-to-diversity

Intro to Organizational Behavior (OB): Organizational Culture and Change - Functions and Dysfunctions of Culture, Integration Adaptability Barrier to Change Barrier to Diversity

By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.

⏱️ ~7 min read

Functions and Dysfunctions of Organizational Culture

What This Is

Organizational culture is the shared values, beliefs, norms, and practices that shape how employees think, feel, and behave. It acts as a "social glue" that integrates employees, guides decision-making, and influences performance—but it can also create rigidities, resist change, and exclude diverse perspectives. For example, Netflix’s "Freedom & Responsibility" culture empowers employees with autonomy (a function) but can also create high-pressure environments where underperformers are quickly exited (a dysfunction). Understanding culture’s dual role helps managers leverage its strengths while mitigating its risks.


Key Theories & Models

  • Schein’s Three Levels of Culture: Artifacts (visible symbols, e.g., dress code, office layout), Espoused Values (stated beliefs, e.g., "innovation"), and Basic Assumptions (unconscious, taken-for-granted beliefs, e.g., "failure is unacceptable"). Implication: To change culture, target basic assumptions—not just surface-level artifacts (e.g., Google’s "20% time" policy failed when engineers’ assumption that "busy = productive" persisted).

  • Competing Values Framework (Quinn & Rohrbaugh): Cultures fall into four types based on two axes: Flexibility vs. Control and Internal vs. External Focus.

  • Clan (collaborative, family-like, e.g., Zappos)
  • Adhocracy (innovative, risk-taking, e.g., Tesla)
  • Hierarchy (structured, efficient, e.g., McDonald’s)
  • Market (competitive, results-driven, e.g., Amazon) Implication: No "best" culture—match the type to strategy (e.g., a startup needs Adhocracy; a hospital may need Hierarchy).

  • Integration Perspective (Martin, 1992): Culture is a unified, shared system that promotes consistency and alignment (e.g., Southwest Airlines’ "LUV" culture—employees consistently prioritize customer service and teamwork). Implication: Strong cultures improve coordination but can stifle dissent (e.g., Enron’s "rank-and-yank" culture rewarded risk-taking until it enabled fraud).

  • Differentiation Perspective (Martin, 1992): Culture is fragmented, with subcultures (e.g., R&D vs. sales) that may conflict. Example: At Microsoft in the 2000s, the Windows team’s "ship at all costs" culture clashed with the Office team’s "polish first" approach. Implication: Manage subcultures to avoid silos (e.g., Google’s "Googley" culture encourages cross-team collaboration via "20% projects").

  • Adaptability Culture (Denison Model): Cultures that value mission, consistency, involvement, and adaptability outperform others. Example: Netflix’s culture deck emphasizes "context, not control" to adapt quickly to market changes. Implication: High adaptability = better innovation and crisis response (e.g., Zoom’s pandemic pivot from B2B to consumer-friendly).

  • Barriers to Change (Kotter & Schlesinger, 1979): Culture resists change due to:

  • Parochial self-interest (fear of losing status, e.g., middle managers resisting digital transformation).
  • Misunderstanding (lack of trust in leadership, e.g., Boeing’s 737 MAX crisis—engineers’ concerns were ignored).
  • Low tolerance for change (habit, e.g., Kodak’s failure to embrace digital photography). Implication: Use participative change (involve employees) and explicit communication to overcome resistance.

  • Barriers to Diversity (Cox, 1993): Culture can exclude diverse groups via:

  • Structural integration (lack of diversity in leadership, e.g., Silicon Valley’s "bro culture").
  • Informal integration (exclusion from networks, e.g., women in finance reporting fewer mentorship opportunities).
  • Cultural bias (unconscious assumptions, e.g., Amazon’s AI hiring tool favoring male résumés). Implication: Audit culture for bias (e.g., Salesforce’s equal pay assessments) and redesign norms (e.g., Accenture’s "truly human" culture).

Step-by-Step Application: Diagnosing and Shaping Culture

  1. Assess the Current Culture
  2. Use Schein’s levels: Observe artifacts (e.g., open offices = collaboration?), survey espoused values (e.g., "We value work-life balance" vs. 80-hour weeks), and interview employees to uncover basic assumptions (e.g., "Is risk-taking punished?").
  3. Tool: Denison’s Organizational Culture Survey (measures adaptability, mission, etc.).

  4. Map Culture to Strategy

  5. Compare culture type (Competing Values Framework) to business needs:
    • Growth?-Adhocracy (e.g., SpaceX’s "move fast" culture).
    • Stability?-Hierarchy (e.g., Toyota’s lean manufacturing).
  6. Red flag: Mismatch (e.g., a Clan culture in a cost-cutting turnaround).

  7. Identify Functions vs. Dysfunctions

  8. Functions: Integration (e.g., Southwest’s "employees first" culture reduces turnover), adaptability (e.g., Netflix’s "sunshine" feedback).
  9. Dysfunctions: Barriers to change (e.g., Blockbuster’s "retail-first" culture ignoring streaming), barriers to diversity (e.g., Uber’s "brogrammer" culture).
  10. Tool: SWOT analysis (Strengths = functions; Weaknesses = dysfunctions).

  11. Target Basic Assumptions for Change

  12. Example: Microsoft’s shift from "know-it-all" to "learn-it-all" under Satya Nadella required changing the assumption that "internal competition drives success" to "collaboration drives success."
  13. Tactics:

    • Symbolic actions (e.g., CEO town halls to model new behaviors).
    • Structural changes (e.g., Google’s OKRs to align goals).
    • Socialization (e.g., Zappos’ "culture fit" interviews).
  14. Mitigate Barriers to Diversity

  15. Audit: Track diversity metrics (e.g., Intel’s $300M diversity initiative).
  16. Redesign norms: Replace biased language (e.g., "guys"-"team") and rituals (e.g., after-work drinks-family-friendly events).
  17. Leadership accountability: Tie bonuses to diversity goals (e.g., Starbucks’ anti-bias training).

  18. Measure and Iterate

  19. Metrics: Employee engagement surveys (e.g., Gallup Q12), turnover rates, innovation output (e.g., 3M’s 15% rule for side projects).
  20. Example: Adobe’s "Check-In" culture (replacing annual reviews with ongoing feedback) improved retention by 30%.

Common Misconceptions

  • Misconception: "Strong culture = always good." Correction: Strong cultures can be toxic (e.g., Wells Fargo’s sales culture led to fraud) or inflexible (e.g., Nokia’s "burning platform" memo admitting cultural rigidity killed its smartphone dominance). Why? Strength-alignment with strategy or ethics.

  • Misconception: "Culture is just perks (e.g., free food, ping-pong tables)." Correction: Perks are artifacts—real culture is in basic assumptions (e.g., Google’s perks mask a high-pressure "always-on" culture). Example: WeWork’s "community" culture collapsed when basic assumptions ("growth at all costs") clashed with reality.

  • Misconception: "Diversity = inclusion." Correction: Diversity is representation; inclusion is belonging (e.g., tech companies with diverse hires but high attrition due to exclusionary norms). Example: Salesforce’s "Ohana" culture (Hawaiian for "family") focuses on inclusion, not just hiring.

  • Misconception: "Culture change happens quickly." Correction: Culture change takes 3–10 years (e.g., Microsoft’s transformation under Nadella took 5+ years). Why? Basic assumptions are deeply ingrained (e.g., GE’s "rank-and-yank" culture persisted for decades).

  • Misconception: "Culture is the CEO’s job." Correction: Culture is co-created by leaders and employees (e.g., Patagonia’s environmental activism started with employee-led initiatives). Example: Southwest’s culture thrives because all employees (not just HR) reinforce it.


Exam / Case Interview Tips

  1. Question Pattern: "How would you diagnose this company’s culture?"
  2. Answer Framework:
    1. Schein’s levels (artifacts-values-assumptions).
    2. Competing Values Framework (identify culture type).
    3. Denison Model (adaptability, mission, etc.).
    4. Dysfunctions (barriers to change/diversity).
  3. Example: For Uber’s pre-2017 culture, note:

    • Artifacts: "War rooms," aggressive language.
    • Values: "Always be hustlin’."
    • Assumptions: "Win at all costs."
    • Dysfunction: Barrier to diversity (toxic masculinity).
  4. Tricky Distinction: "Integration vs. Differentiation Perspective"

  5. Integration: Culture is shared (e.g., Southwest’s "LUV").
  6. Differentiation: Culture has subcultures (e.g., Microsoft’s Windows vs. Office teams).
  7. Trap: Assuming a company has one culture—most have both (e.g., Amazon’s "Day 1" culture coexists with warehouse subcultures).

  8. Question Pattern: "How would you change this culture?"

  9. Answer Framework:
    1. Unfreeze (create urgency, e.g., Netflix’s "Freedom & Responsibility" deck).
    2. Change (new artifacts/values, e.g., Microsoft’s "growth mindset" training).
    3. Refreeze (reinforce via rewards, e.g., Google’s peer bonuses).
  10. Avoid: Generic answers like "communicate more"—tie to specific theories (e.g., "Use Kotter’s 8-step model").

  11. Question Pattern: "Why is diversity failing in this company?"

  12. Answer Framework:
    1. Structural integration (e.g., all-male leadership).
    2. Informal integration (e.g., "old boys’ club" networking).
    3. Cultural bias (e.g., "culture fit" interviews favoring similarity).
  13. Example: Goldman Sachs’ "boys’ club" culture persisted due to all three barriers.

Quick Practice Scenario

Scenario 1: At "TechNova," a 500-person SaaS company, engineers work in silos, sales teams hoard client data, and the CEO’s "move fast" mantra clashes with the CFO’s "cut costs" demands. Employee surveys show low trust in leadership. Using the Differentiation Perspective, what’s the core issue, and how would you address it?

Answer: The issue is competing subcultures (engineering vs. sales vs. finance) with misaligned basic assumptions (speed vs. cost control). Solution: Use Denison’s Model to align subcultures around a shared mission (e.g., "customer-first innovation") and adaptability (e.g., cross-functional "tiger teams" for key projects).


Scenario 2: "GreenEarth," a renewable energy startup, has a strong "eco-warrior" culture where employees work 70-hour weeks to "save the planet." Turnover is high, and women report feeling excluded from late-night brainstorming sessions. Using Barriers to Diversity, what’s the dysfunction, and what’s one structural fix?

Answer: The dysfunction is informal integration (exclusionary norms like late-night sessions) and cultural bias (assuming "eco-warrior" = overwork). Fix: Redesign rituals (e.g., "core hours" for meetings) and audit promotion criteria for bias (e.g., Patagonia’s on-site childcare to support working parents).


Last-Minute Cram Sheet

  1. Schein’s 3 Levels: Artifacts (visible), Values (stated), Assumptions (unconscious).
  2. Competing Values Framework: Clan (collab), Adhocracy (innovate), Hierarchy (control), Market (compete).
  3. Integration Perspective: Culture is shared (e.g., Southwest’s "LUV").
  4. Differentiation Perspective: Culture has subcultures (e.g., Microsoft’s teams).
  5. Adaptability Culture (Denison): Mission + Consistency + Involvement + Adaptability = high performance.
  6. Barriers to Change (Kotter): Self-interest, misunderstanding, low tolerance.
  7. Barriers to Diversity (Cox): Structural (hiring), Informal (networks), Cultural (bias).
  8. Strong culture-good culture (e.g., Wells Fargo’s fraud).
  9. Perks-culture (e.g., Google’s free food-"always-on" pressure).
  10. Culture change takes 3–10 years (e.g., Microsoft’s transformation).