By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.
Intermediate – requires understanding of evolution of constitutional reforms, interlinkages between Acts, and distinction between provincial and federal provisions; frequently tested in both prelims and mains.
Trap: Separate electorates were introduced for the first time in the 1919 Act – Fact: Separate electorates were introduced in the 1909 Act for Muslims; 1919 Act extended them to other communities (Source: Bipan Chandra, India’s Struggle for Independence).
Trap: Dyarchy was introduced at the Centre by the 1935 Act and successfully implemented – Fact: Dyarchy was introduced at Centre by 1935 Act but never implemented because the proposed All?India Federation did not materialize (Source: Government of India Act 1935, Part II, Section 51).
Trap: The 1919 Act introduced direct elections for the first time in India – Fact: Direct elections were introduced in limited form under the 1909 Act; 1919 Act expanded them but with restricted franchise (Source: Sumit Sarkar, Modern India).
Trap: The Federal Court was established under the 1919 Act – Fact: Federal Court was established under the 1935 Act and commenced functioning in 1937 (Source: Government of India Act 1935, Section 200).
Question: Which of the following provisions were introduced by the Government of India Act 1919?1. Dyarchy in the provinces2. Bicameral legislature at the Centre3. Direct election of members to provincial councils4. Federal Court Select the correct answer using the code below: A) 1 and 2 only B) 1, 2 and 3 only C) 2, 3 and 4 only D) 1, 2, 3 and 4 Answer: B Explanation: The 1919 Act introduced dyarchy in provinces, bicameral legislature at Centre, and expanded direct elections; Federal Court was established under 1935 Act. Why others fail: Option D is tempting because all four are constitutional developments, but Federal Court came under 1935 Act.
Question: The concept of provincial autonomy was introduced in which of the following Acts? A) Indian Councils Act 1909 B) Government of India Act 1919 C) Government of India Act 1935 D) Indian Independence Act 1947 Answer: C Explanation: Provincial autonomy was introduced under the Government of India Act 1935, replacing dyarchy in provinces. Why others fail: Option B is tempting because 1919 Act introduced dyarchy, but it did not grant full provincial autonomy.
Question: Which of the following statements about the Government of India Act 1935 is correct? A) It abolished dyarchy both at the Centre and in the provinces B) It introduced separate electorates for the first time C) It provided for an All?India Federation including princely states D) It established the Reserve Bank of India in 1947 Answer: C Explanation: The 1935 Act proposed an All?India Federation comprising British Indian provinces and princely states; however, it never came into effect. Why others fail: Option A is tempting because dyarchy was abolished in provinces, but it was introduced at the Centre.
Question: The Simon Commission was opposed in India primarily because: A) It recommended continuation of separate electorates B) It was appointed during the tenure of a Conservative government C) It had no Indian member D) It recommended against provincial autonomy Answer: C Explanation: The Simon Commission (1927) consisted of seven British MPs with no Indian representation, leading to nationwide protests under the slogan "Simon Go Back". Why others fail: Option A is tempting because separate electorates were controversial, but the primary reason for opposition was absence of Indian members.
Question: Which of the following was NOT a feature of the Indian Councils Act 1909? A) Introduction of separate electorates for Muslims B) Expansion of legislative councils at Centre and provinces C) Ministers responsible to legislative councils D) Inclusion of elected members in legislative councils Answer: C Explanation: The 1909 Act expanded councils and introduced elected members and separate electorates, but ministers were not responsible to councils; executive was not accountable. Why others fail: Option D is tempting because elected members were few, but they were indeed introduced under 1909.
Join 4M+ learners. Unlock unlimited quizzes, wrong-answer tracking, flashcards + reminders, study guides, and 1-on-1 challenges.