Fatskills
Practice. Master. Repeat.
Study Guide: UPSC GS Paper I: Modern History, Constitutional Acts, 1909, 1919, 1935, Provisions and Significance
Source: https://www.fatskills.com/upsc-civil-services-examination-cse/chapter/upsc-gs-paper-i-modern-history-constitutional-acts-1909-1919-1935-provisions-and-significance

UPSC GS Paper I: Modern History, Constitutional Acts, 1909, 1919, 1935, Provisions and Significance

By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.

⏱️ ~6 min read

Must?Know (20–25 detailed bullets)

  • Indian Councils Act 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms) – introduced separate electorates for Muslims; Lord Morley (Secretary of State) and Lord Minto (Viceroy) were key architects.
  • 1909 Act increased non?official members in Central and provincial councils; in provinces, non?officials formed majority but with limited powers.
  • Council membership under 1909 Act included nominated official, nominated non?official, and elected members; elected members still formed minority.
  • Separate electorates under 1909 Act allowed Muslims to elect their own representatives; led to institutionalization of communal representation.
  • 1909 Act did not introduce responsible government; executive authority remained with Viceroy and Governors, not accountable to councils.
  • Montagu Declaration (1917) – first official British commitment to gradual development of self?governing institutions in India; precursor to 1919 reforms.
  • Government of India Act 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms) – introduced dyarchy in provinces: subjects divided into reserved (finance, law and order) and transferred (education, health).
  • Under 1919 Act, transferred subjects were administered by ministers responsible to provincial legislatures; reserved subjects remained under Governor’s control.
  • 1919 Act established bicameral legislature at Centre: Council of State (upper house) and Legislative Assembly (lower house).
  • 1919 Act expanded franchise: about 3% of population could vote, based on property, tax, education qualifications.
  • 1919 Act created office of High Commissioner for India in London to manage Indian affairs in Britain.
  • 1919 Act introduced communal representation for Muslims, Sikhs, Anglo?Indians, Europeans, and Indian Christians.
  • 1919 Act separated Central and provincial subjects via two lists; Centre retained control over defence, foreign affairs, communications.
  • 1919 Act established Public Service Commission; first one set up in 1926 (Federal Public Service Commission).
  • Simon Commission (1927) – appointed to review working of 1919 Act; consisted of seven British MPs, no Indian member; triggered nationwide protests.
  • Government of India Act 1935 – based on recommendations of Simon Commission and discussions at Round Table Conferences (1930–32).
  • 1935 Act introduced provincial autonomy: abolished dyarchy in provinces, all subjects placed under ministers responsible to elected legislatures.
  • 1935 Act introduced dyarchy at Centre: federal subjects divided into reserved (defence, foreign affairs) and transferred (education, health), but federal part never implemented.
  • 1935 Act provided for bicameral legislature at Centre: Council of States (upper) and Federal Assembly (lower); Council of States became permanent body.
  • 1935 Act created Federal Court (established 1937); first apex court in India, precursor to Supreme Court (1950).
  • 1935 Act introduced Burma’s separation from India (effective 1937); India and Burma became separate administrative units.
  • 1935 Act provided for establishment of Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in 1935; RBI started functioning April 1, 1935.
  • 1935 Act expanded franchise to about 10–14% of population; basis of voting was property, income, education, tax.
  • 1935 Act created Federal Public Service Commission (later UPSC), Provincial Public Service Commissions (later SPSCs).
  • 1935 Act proposed All?India Federation including British Indian provinces and princely states; federation never came into being due to lack of princely state consent.

Difficulty Level

Intermediate – requires understanding of evolution of constitutional reforms, interlinkages between Acts, and distinction between provincial and federal provisions; frequently tested in both prelims and mains.

Common UPSC Traps (3–5 factual traps)

Trap: Separate electorates were introduced for the first time in the 1919 Act – Fact: Separate electorates were introduced in the 1909 Act for Muslims; 1919 Act extended them to other communities (Source: Bipan Chandra, India’s Struggle for Independence).

Trap: Dyarchy was introduced at the Centre by the 1935 Act and successfully implemented – Fact: Dyarchy was introduced at Centre by 1935 Act but never implemented because the proposed All?India Federation did not materialize (Source: Government of India Act 1935, Part II, Section 51).

Trap: The 1919 Act introduced direct elections for the first time in India – Fact: Direct elections were introduced in limited form under the 1909 Act; 1919 Act expanded them but with restricted franchise (Source: Sumit Sarkar, Modern India).

Trap: The Federal Court was established under the 1919 Act – Fact: Federal Court was established under the 1935 Act and commenced functioning in 1937 (Source: Government of India Act 1935, Section 200).

Practice MCQs (5–7 questions)

Question: Which of the following provisions were introduced by the Government of India Act 1919?

1. Dyarchy in the provinces

2. Bicameral legislature at the Centre

3. Direct election of members to provincial councils

4. Federal Court
Select the correct answer using the code below:
A) 1 and 2 only
B) 1, 2 and 3 only
C) 2, 3 and 4 only
D) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Answer: B
Explanation: The 1919 Act introduced dyarchy in provinces, bicameral legislature at Centre, and expanded direct elections; Federal Court was established under 1935 Act.
Why others fail: Option D is tempting because all four are constitutional developments, but Federal Court came under 1935 Act.

Question: The concept of provincial autonomy was introduced in which of the following Acts?
A) Indian Councils Act 1909
B) Government of India Act 1919
C) Government of India Act 1935
D) Indian Independence Act 1947
Answer: C
Explanation: Provincial autonomy was introduced under the Government of India Act 1935, replacing dyarchy in provinces.
Why others fail: Option B is tempting because 1919 Act introduced dyarchy, but it did not grant full provincial autonomy.

Question: Which of the following statements about the Government of India Act 1935 is correct?
A) It abolished dyarchy both at the Centre and in the provinces
B) It introduced separate electorates for the first time
C) It provided for an All?India Federation including princely states
D) It established the Reserve Bank of India in 1947
Answer: C
Explanation: The 1935 Act proposed an All?India Federation comprising British Indian provinces and princely states; however, it never came into effect.
Why others fail: Option A is tempting because dyarchy was abolished in provinces, but it was introduced at the Centre.

Question: The Simon Commission was opposed in India primarily because:
A) It recommended continuation of separate electorates
B) It was appointed during the tenure of a Conservative government
C) It had no Indian member
D) It recommended against provincial autonomy
Answer: C
Explanation: The Simon Commission (1927) consisted of seven British MPs with no Indian representation, leading to nationwide protests under the slogan "Simon Go Back".
Why others fail: Option A is tempting because separate electorates were controversial, but the primary reason for opposition was absence of Indian members.

Question: Which of the following was NOT a feature of the Indian Councils Act 1909?
A) Introduction of separate electorates for Muslims
B) Expansion of legislative councils at Centre and provinces
C) Ministers responsible to legislative councils
D) Inclusion of elected members in legislative councils
Answer: C
Explanation: The 1909 Act expanded councils and introduced elected members and separate electorates, but ministers were not responsible to councils; executive was not accountable.
Why others fail: Option D is tempting because elected members were few, but they were indeed introduced under 1909.

Last?Minute Revision (20–25 one?liners)

  • 1909 Act: Also known as Morley-Minto Reforms.
  • 1909 Act: Separate electorates introduced for Muslims.
  • 1909 Act: Non?official majority in provincial councils only.
  • 1909 Act: Viceroy retained veto power over legislation.
  • 1917: Montagu Declaration promised self?governing institutions.
  • 1919 Act: Dyarchy introduced in provinces.
  • 1919 Act: Subjects divided into reserved and transferred.
  • 1919 Act: Ministers responsible only for transferred subjects.
  • 1919 Act: Bicameral legislature at Centre established.
  • 1919 Act: Franchise extended to ~3% of population.
  • 1919 Act: Public Service Commission first proposed.
  • 1926: First Public Service Commission set up under 1919 Act.
  • 1927: Simon Commission appointed.
  • 1928: Nehru Report rejected separate electorates, proposed dominion status.
  • 1930–32: Three Round Table Conferences held in London.
  • 1935 Act: Provincial autonomy introduced.
  • 1935 Act: Dyarchy at Centre, never implemented.
  • 1935 Act: All?India Federation proposed, never formed.
  • 1935 Act: Federal Court established in 1937.
  • 1935 Act: Reserve Bank of India established in 1935.
  • 1935 Act: Federal Public Service Commission created.
  • 1935 Act: Burma separated from India in 1937.
  • 1935 Act: Most comprehensive constitutional reform before independence.
  • 1935 Act: Major source of provisions for the Indian Constitution (e.g., federal structure, emergency powers, public service commissions).
  • Simon Commission: No Indian member – key reason for boycott.