By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.
Hard – due to overlapping legal frameworks, evolving insurgent dynamics, and frequent policy shifts requiring updated factual knowledge.
Trap: AFSPA is applicable only in Northeast India – Fact: AFSPA applies in both Northeast and Jammu & Kashmir; Armed Forces (J&K) Special Powers Act, 1990, is a separate but similar law, per Ministry of Home Affairs notifications. Trap: UAPA allows preventive detention without trial indefinitely – Fact: UAPA permits detention up to 180 days without formal charges, subject to review, under Section 43D(5); not indefinite, as clarified in Human Rights Law Network v. Union of India (2011). Trap: Naxalism is primarily a religious conflict – Fact: LWE is a left-wing extremist movement rooted in socio-economic grievances like land rights and forest displacement, as per Bhima Koregaon incident analysis and MHA annual reports. Trap: All insurgent groups in Northeast are secessionist – Fact: Some groups like NSCN (IM) seek greater autonomy within Indian Constitution, not secession, as stated in 2015 Framework Agreement. Trap: Operation All Out was launched by Indian Army – Fact: Operation All Out (2017) was led by J&K Police with CAPFs, not Indian Army, to maintain civilian law enforcement character, per MHA press release.
Question: Which of the following pairs is correctly matched regarding insurgency groups and their regions of operation? A) NSCN (IM) – Manipur B) ULFA – Nagaland C) NLFT – Assam D) Hizbul Mujahideen – Punjab Answer: A Explanation: NSCN (IM) operates primarily in Nagaland and Manipur; its leadership includes Manipuri and Naga cadres. Why others fail: B is tempting because ULFA is in Northeast, but it is specific to Assam, not Nagaland.
Question: The Salwa Judum was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in which case? A) PUCL v. Union of India (2003) B) Nandini Sundar v. State of Chhattisgarh (2011) C) Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) D) Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) Answer: B Explanation: In Nandini Sundar v. State of Chhattisgarh (2011), SC ruled Salwa Judum violated constitutional rights and Article 21. Why others fail: A deals with right to food and governance, often confused due to similar acronym (PUCL).
Question: Which Act empowers the central government to designate individuals as terrorists? A) Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA), 2002 B) National Security Act (NSA), 1980 C) Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967 D) Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA), 1958 Answer: C Explanation: 2019 amendment to UAPA introduced Section 35, enabling individual terrorist designation. Why others fail: A (POTA) allowed such provisions but was repealed in 2004; hence not currently valid.
Question: The Inner Line Permit (ILP) system is derived from which colonial regulation? A) Government of India Act, 1935 B) Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulations, 1873 C) Indian Forest Act, 1927 D) Assam Frontier Tracts Rules, 1913 Answer: B Explanation: ILP is operational under Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulations, 1873, currently applied in four Northeastern states. Why others fail: D sounds plausible due to regional specificity, but is not the legal source of ILP.
Question: Which of the following statements about Operation Green Hunt is correct? A) It was a military operation conducted solely by the Indian Army. B) It was launched in response to the 2008 Mumbai attacks. C) It was a coordinated anti-Maoist operation involving multiple states and CAPFs. D) It was initiated by the Ministry of Defence in 2006. Answer: C Explanation: Operation Green Hunt (2009) was a multi-state anti-LWE initiative led by MHA with CRPF and state police. Why others fail: A is tempting due to military-like operations, but Indian Army is not deployed in internal law and order roles.
Question: The Framework Agreement related to peace talks with NSCN (IM) was signed in which year? A) 2001 B) 2013 C) 2015 D) 2018 Answer: C Explanation: Government of India signed Framework Agreement with NSCN (IM) on August 3, 2015, for Naga peace process. Why others fail: B (2013) saw ceasefire extension, often mistaken for final agreement.
Question: Which of the following is NOT a provision under AFSPA, 1958? A) Power to arrest without warrant B) Power to shoot to kill based on suspicion C) Immunity from prosecution without prior central government sanction D) Power to conduct searches without warrant Answer: B Explanation: AFSPA allows use of force only when "motive is to maintain public order", not mere suspicion; shooting to kill requires reasonable belief of threat, per Naga People’s Movement case. Why others fail: B is often assumed correct due to perception of AFSPA as draconian, but not legally accurate.
Join 4M+ learners. Unlock unlimited quizzes, wrong-answer tracking, flashcards + reminders, study guides, and 1-on-1 challenges.