As per principle mentioned in the second paragraph of Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a promise is discharged if, for some cause which the promisor could not prevent, performance may become impossible by:I. change in law rendering a contract unlawful or impossible of performanceII. destruction or non-existence of the specific subject matter assumed by the parties to exist or continue in existenceIII. the non-existence of a state of things assumed as the foundation of the contractIV. such circumstances intervening which render the performance within the time in the way contemplated, impossible, although, performance of the contract according to its terms may be literally possible, the death or disability of the promisor, where the promise was to perform something in person

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 438  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
Indian Contract Act, 1872 Practice Test — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.

The Indian Contract Act of 1872 is a legal framework that regulates contracts in India and is applicable to all states except Jammu & Kashmir. It was first published on April 25, 1872, and has 266 sections. The act is based on English Common Law and has been amended several times to keep up with changing economic conditions.  The act defines a contract as an agreement that is enforceable by law. It also defines an agreement as every promise and every set of promises that form the consideration for each other. A valid contract is formed when certain essential elements are present,... Show more

As per principle mentioned in the second paragraph of Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a promise is discharged if, for some cause which the promisor could not prevent, performance may become impossible by:<br>I. change in law rendering a contract unlawful or impossible of performance<br>II. destruction or non-existence of the specific subject matter assumed by the parties to exist or continue in existence<br>III. the non-existence of a state of things assumed as the foundation of the contract<br>IV. such circumstances intervening which render the performance within the time in the way contemplated, impossible, although, performance of the contract according to its terms may be literally possible, the death or disability of the promisor, where the promise was to perform something in person