Legal Principle: A minor is not competent to enter into a contract and the law will assume that the contract never happened and everything is returned to as it was.Factual Situation: A minor fraudulently misrepresenting her age, enters into a contract with another of the purchase of a piano. After the piano has been delivered, she refused to pay the price for the same contending the non-existence of a legally binding contract. (SET LAW 2010)

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 566  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
Legal Aptitude Test — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.

Each question consists of legal principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such proposition may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. You have to apply the principles to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Only one of the alternatives, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion. Remember: you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given for every question.

Legal Principle: A minor is not competent to enter into a contract and the law will assume that the contract never happened and everything is returned to as it was.<br>Factual Situation: A minor fraudulently misrepresenting her age, enters into a contract with another of the purchase of a piano. After the piano has been delivered, she refused to pay the price for the same contending the non-existence of a legally binding contract. (SET LAW 2010)






ADVERTISEMENT