Legal Principle: Defamation means publication of a statement injuring the reputation of a person without lawful justification. Such statement must reflect on a person's reputation and tends to lower him in the estimation of right thinking members of the society generally or tends to make them shun or avoid him.Factual Situation: Madam Tussauds Ltd. decided to keep a waxwork exhibition and placed an effigy of Babloo Prasad with a gun, in a room adjoining the 'Chamber of Horrors'. Mr Babloo Prasad had been tried for murder in India and released on a verdict of 'not proven guilty' and a representation of the scene of the alleged murder was displayed in the Chamber of Horrors. Does this amount to defamation? (AILET 2014)Decision:

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 566  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
Legal Aptitude Test — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.

Each question consists of legal principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such proposition may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. You have to apply the principles to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Only one of the alternatives, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion. Remember: you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given for every question.

Legal Principle: Defamation means publication of a statement injuring the reputation of a person without lawful justification. Such statement must reflect on a person's reputation and tends to lower him in the estimation of right thinking members of the society generally or tends to make them shun or avoid him.<br>Factual Situation: Madam Tussauds Ltd. decided to keep a waxwork exhibition and placed an effigy of Babloo Prasad with a gun, in a room adjoining the 'Chamber of Horrors'. Mr Babloo Prasad had been tried for murder in India and released on a verdict of 'not proven guilty' and a representation of the scene of the alleged murder was displayed in the Chamber of Horrors. Does this amount to defamation? (AILET 2014)<br>Decision:






ADVERTISEMENT