Legal Principle: Every person shall be liable to punishment under the Indian Penal Code and not otherwise for every act or omission contrary to the provisions of the Code of which he shall be guilty within the territory of India. In other words, the exercise of criminal jurisdiction depends upon the locality of the offence committed and not upon the nationality or locality of the offender.Factual Situation: X, a Pakistani citizen, while staying at Karachi, made false representations to Y, the complainant, in Bombay through letters, telephone calls and telegrams and induced the complainant to part with money amounting to over ` 5 lakhs to the agents of X at Bombay, so that rice could be shipped from Karachi to India as per agreement. But the rice was never supplied to the complainant. (CLAT 2014)

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 566  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
Legal Aptitude Test — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.

Each question consists of legal principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such proposition may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. You have to apply the principles to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Only one of the alternatives, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion. Remember: you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given for every question.

Legal Principle: Every person shall be liable to punishment under the Indian Penal Code and not otherwise for every act or omission contrary to the provisions of the Code of which he shall be guilty within the territory of India. In other words, the exercise of criminal jurisdiction depends upon the locality of the offence committed and not upon the nationality or locality of the offender.<br>Factual Situation: X, a Pakistani citizen, while staying at Karachi, made false representations to Y, the complainant, in Bombay through letters, telephone calls and telegrams and induced the complainant to part with money amounting to over ` 5 lakhs to the agents of X at Bombay, so that rice could be shipped from Karachi to India as per agreement. But the rice was never supplied to the complainant. (CLAT 2014)






ADVERTISEMENT