Legal Principle: Ignorantia juris non excusat and ignorantia facit excusat.Factual Situation: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th November 1962, it was found on search that George carried 3. kgs. of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the 'Manifest for transit'. On 26th November 1962, Government of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and not it is necessary that the gold must be declared in 'Manifest' of the aircraft. (CLAT 2015)

Each question consists of legal principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such proposition may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. You have to apply the principles to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Only one of the alternatives, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion. Remember: you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given for every question.