Legal Principle: res ipsa loquitur le. The thing speaks for itself.Factual Situation: Seema got herself operated for the removal of her uterus in the defendant's hospital, as she was diagnosed to have a cyst in one of her ovaries. Due to the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery. (CLAT 2013)

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 566  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
Legal Aptitude Test — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.

Each question consists of legal principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such proposition may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. You have to apply the principles to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Only one of the alternatives, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion. Remember: you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given for every question.

Legal Principle: res ipsa loquitur le. The thing speaks for itself.<br>Factual Situation: Seema got herself operated for the removal of her uterus in the defendant's hospital, as she was diagnosed to have a cyst in one of her ovaries. Due to the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery. (CLAT 2013)






ADVERTISEMENT