Home > CompTIA Security+ Certification > Quizzes > Indian Penal Code Basics Practice Test
Indian Penal Code Basics Practice Test
Fast practice, instant feedback. Timer auto-submits when time’s up.
Avg score: 13% Most missed: “Concealing with intent to facilitate a design to wage war is dealt under-”
The Indian Penal Code (IPC) is a criminal code that defines crimes and their punishments. It was adopted in 1862 and applied to British India, except for princely states. After India's independence, the government adopted the IPC as the country's criminal code. In December 2023, the IPC was replaced by Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.  The IPC is one of the four pillars of India's judicial system, along with the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and the Indian Evidence Act. The IPC defines civil law rights and responsibilities, and outlines the process for resolving civil disputes.  The IPC is divided... Show more
Indian Penal Code Basics Practice Test
Time left 00:00
25 Questions

1. Abetting the commission of an offence by the public or by more than ten persons is dealt under-
2. Read the following: (1) Indian Courts have jurisdiction to try crime committed by an Indian in a foreign country. (2) Indian Courts do not have jurisdiction to try crime committed by a foreigner in India.
Of the above:
3. The appellant stabbed the deceased in the abdomen. The deceased was taken promptly to hospital and the wound was stitched but few days later he died. The evidence showed that at the time of death the wound had healed. But due to terramycin injection being given in excess lungs had become over logged and caused pneumonia on the question of causation:
4. X was accused of a criminal offence by Y and the case pended on for 12 years, during which not a single witness was produced by the prosecution. Which of the following article of the Constitution of India in this case was vio­lated?
5. The basic principle which runs through Section 32 to 38 of IPC is that:
6. The law of contempt is exercised in case of:
7. The expression “unsoundness of mind”:
8. In which of the following Sections of I.P.C. ‘preparation’ is punishable:
9. Under section 98 right to private defence also is available against a:
10. Adultery is an offence committed:
11. Oral threat or inducement allegedly given by lawyers to approver not to give any statement against accused:
12. Which of the following Section of the IPC has not been omitted?
13. Promoting enmity between classes in place of worship, etc. is dealt under-
14. In case of an offence punishable with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay a fine of not exceeding Rs. 100 but exceeding Rs. 50, the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not exceed:
15. The three accused armed with firearms and Accused 1 with lathi came to the shot of the incident for the pur­pose of avenging the old enmity. It was alleged that it was on the exhortation made by the Accused 1, not to spare the deceased that the other accused started firing at the de­ceased. It was held that when all the accused had reached the place of incident for the purpose of avenging the old enmity nurtured by them should they wait for Accused 1 to make exhortation to use the words “don’t allow him to flee and don’t spare him this time.”. Which of the fol­lowing judgment is the correct judgment regarding the mentioned case?
16. Using a false property mark with inten to deceive or in­jure any person is dealt under
17. Which of the following Section of the IPC relate to extra­territorial operations of the Code?
18. The right to private defence is available with respect to:
19. In case of imprisonment for non-payment of fine, if a part of the fine is paid, such sentence:
20. Who was the President of the drafting committee of the Indian Penal Code?
21. ‘Sedition’ as offence was held constitutionally valid in Kedar Nath v. State of Bihar, AIR 1962 SC 955 us dealt under-
22. Wantonly giving provocation with intent to cause riot, if rioting be not committed is dealt under-
23. Robbery is dacoity when the minimum number of persons committing robbery is:
24. A accused of murder, alleges that by reason of unsoundness of mind, he did not know the nature of the act.
25. Section 10-C was used in which of the following cases?