Consider the following two sets of LR(1) items of an LR(1) grammar.X -> c.X, c/dX -> .cX, c/dX -> .d, c/dX -> c.X, $X -> .cX, $X -> .d, $Which of the following statements related to merging of the two sets in the corresponding LALR parser is/are FALSE?1. Cannot be merged since look aheads are different.2. Can be merged but will result in S-R conflict.3. Can be merged but will result in R-R conflict.4. Cannot be merged since goto on c will lead to two different sets.

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 95  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
Theory of Computation and Compiler Design Practice Test — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.

Automata theory (also known as Theory Of Computation) is a theoretical branch of Computer Science and Mathematics, which mainly deals with the logic of computation with respect to simple machines, referred to as automata. Automata* enables scientists to understand how machines compute the functions and solve problems.
Theory of Computation is very important in compiler design as it helps in writing efficient algorithms, which help make efficient compiler construcion.


Consider the following two sets of LR(1) items of an LR(1) grammar.<br>X -> c.X, c/d<br>X -> .cX, c/d<br>X -> .d, c/d<br>X -> c.X, $<br>X -> .cX, $<br>X -> .d, $<br>Which of the following statements related to merging of the two sets in the corresponding LALR parser is/are FALSE?<br>1. Cannot be merged since look aheads are different.<br>2. Can be merged but will result in S-R conflict.<br>3. Can be merged but will result in R-R conflict.<br>4. Cannot be merged since goto on c will lead to two different sets.