Critical Reading For Exams / Short Reading Comprehension 13


The plan which I adopted, and the one by which I was most successful, was that of making friends of all the lit-  tle white boys whom I met in the street. As many of these as I could, I converted into teachers. With their kindly  aid, obtained at different times and in different places, I finally succeeded in learning to read. When I was sent on  errands, I always took my book with me, and by going one part of my errand quickly, I found time to get a lesson  before my return. I used also to carry bread with me, enough of which was always in the house, and to which I was  always welcome for I was much better off in this regard than many of the poor white children in our neighborhood. 


This bread I used to bestow upon the hungry little urchins, who, in turn, would give me treat more valuable bread  of knowledge. I am strongly tempted to give the names of two or three of those little boys, as testimonial of grati-  tude and affection I bear them; but prudence forbids; not that it would injure me, but it might embarrass them; for  it is almost an unpardonable offence to teach slaves to read in this Christian country. It is enough to say of the dear  little fellows, that they live on Philpot Street, very near Durgin and Bailey’s shipyard. I used to talk this matter of  slavery over with them. I would sometimes say to them, I wished I could be as free as they would be when they got  to be men. “You will be free as soon as you are twenty-one, but I am a slave for life! Have not I as good a right to  be free as you have?” These words used to trouble them; they would express for me the liveliest sympathy, and con-  sole me with the hope that something would occur by which I might be free. 
 



Given the facts presented during the time in which the story in the passage takes place, which term best describes the setting?

Understandable
Usual
Normal
Unlikely
Likely

What can the reader infer from the passage about the willingness of the white boys in helping the author learn to read?

Knowledge of the white boys that a slave who could read would have a greater chance of being freed than one who could not read motivated them to help.
Without bread, friendships would have naturally developed leading some of the white boys to help the author learn to read.
Without some reason beyond friendship, the likelihood of them helping would be greatly reduced because teaching a slave to read was not accepted behavior.
Based on the passage, Christians were not supposed to help slaves learn to read so the white boys were not Christians.
Knowing that the author could not read was security for the white boys continuing to get free bread as the author would not know whether what they were teaching was correct or not.

What device did the author use to befriend the boys in the street?

Praised their superior intelligence so they would like him and teach him to read
Discussed the impropriety of slavery and implored them to help him escape
Gave them food so they would be friends with him so he could ask them for help
Wooed them into a sense of ease before asking them for anything
Befriended them by offering them money to teach him to read

What about the statement in lines, “for it is almost an unpardonable offence to teach slaves to read in this Christian country” qualifies as irony?

Slaves could learn to read and were willing to pay handsomely to learn.
Given the belief of Christians that you should treat others as you want to be treated, not to teach someone to read knowing that they wanted to learn to read would not qualify as Christian behavior.
The notion that any act would be “unpardonable” in a forgiving Christian society or country.
The mention of any names of those who taught the author to read would likely get them in trouble or embarrass them because they didn’t have as much food as the slave.
A slave wanted to know how to read and was willing to pay for lessons with bread when the white, free boys of the neighborhood knew how to read but didn’t have enough bread to eat.

How does the author give credit to those who helped him learn to read?

By writing that the ‘bread’ he gave them was much less valuable than the ‘bread of knowledge’ they gave him
By not exposing their names as those who helped him learn to read would be frowned upon by the Christian country and they might be prosecuted for their actions
By talking to them about how he wished he could be free like them
By stating that he would like to list their names but as that might not be good for them, recognize them by indicating where they who helped had lived so they would know of his thanks
By referring to them as “teachers”