Legal Principle: Whoever stores a substance which would cause damage on escape shall be strictly liable (i.e. liable even when he has exercised necessary care) for any damage caused by the escape of that substance. Factual Situation: Cynamide Company was manufacturing acrylonitrile, an extremely toxic chemical. This chemical is used in manufacturing certain pharmaceuticals, manufactured in another factory, owned by Cynamide itself. While transporting acrylonitrile stored in a sealed container to the factory where the pharmaceuticals were manufactured, there was unexpected leakage from the container and the chemical split on the ground. The local municipal authorities immediately rushed in and decontaminated the place. The container was sealed back within a short period of time and subsequently it was realized that the contamination was not that significant and it was not necessary to spend so much resourced for decontamination. The municipal authorities filed a suit against Cynamide Company for whatever cost incurred in decontamination process. But Cynamide Company argued that it would pay only a small sum, which could have taken care of contamination in this case.

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 54  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
Law of Torts Questions Based on Previous Papers — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.


Legal Principle: Whoever stores a substance which would cause damage on escape shall be strictly liable (i.e. liable even when he has exercised necessary care) for any damage caused by the escape of that substance. Factual Situation: Cynamide Company was manufacturing acrylonitrile, an extremely toxic chemical. This chemical is used in manufacturing certain pharmaceuticals, manufactured in another factory, owned by Cynamide itself. While transporting acrylonitrile stored in a sealed container to the factory where the pharmaceuticals were manufactured, there was unexpected leakage from the container and the chemical split on the ground. The local municipal authorities immediately rushed in and decontaminated the place. The container was sealed back within a short period of time and subsequently it was realized that the contamination was not that significant and it was not necessary to spend so much resourced for decontamination. The municipal authorities filed a suit against Cynamide Company for whatever cost incurred in decontamination process. But Cynamide Company argued that it would pay only a small sum, which could have taken care of contamination in this case.





ADVERTISEMENT