Home  >  Law Entrance Exams India  >  Legal Awareness And Legal Reasoning Question for Law Entrance Exams

Frederick Karl von Savigny has observed that:1. custom precedes legislation2. legislation must conform to customary practices3. custom is not important than legislation4. custom is superior to legislation Select the correct answer using the code given below:

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 2184  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
Legal Awareness And Legal Reasoning Question for Law Entrance Exams — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.
🧠 Flashcards (fast review) 🧪 Practice Quiz ⚔️ Challenge a Friend 🥊 📊 View Stats
2150+ Legal Awareness And Legal Reasoning Questions.

The Legal Aptitude or Legal Reasoning section in law entrance exams that holds maximum weightage and demands candidates to possess good knowledge of fundamentals. This section is used to test your legal awareness, analytical skills and problem-solving ability.
 


Frederick Karl von Savigny has observed that:<br />1. custom precedes legislation<br />2. legislation must conform to customary practices<br />3. custom is not important than legislation<br />4. custom is superior to legislation Select the correct answer using the code given below:






 
❤ If you liked Fatskills, consider supporting us by checking out The Life Manuals You Never Got.

🌈  Our mission is to help improve your scores in any subject and exam withonline quizzes, practice tests, study guides, & advice for students. Since 2018.
About | Explore | User Guide | Topics | Subjects | Doubt Solver | Career Aptitude Test | Answers | Free Tools | What Should We Know?
Privacy | Terms |
Without work one finishes nothing. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
© 2026 Fatskills.com

All trademarks, logos and brand names are the property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement.