Principle: One has to compensate another for the injury caused due to his wrongful act. The liability to compensate is reduced to the extent the latter has contributed to the injury through his own negligence. This is the underlying principle of contributory negligence. Facts: Veerappa owns a farm at a distance of half a furlong from the railway track. He stored in his land stacks of dried up straw after the cultivation as is normal in farming. One day when the train was passing through the track, the driver was negligently operating the locomotive by allowing it to emit large quantities of spark. The high wind, normal in open fields, carried the sparks to the stacks stored by Veerappa and the stacks caught fire thereby causing extensive damage. Veerappa filed a suit against the Railways claiming damages. The Railways while acknowledging liability alleged contributory negligence on the part of Veerappa. (NLU DELHI 2011)

2150+ Legal Awareness And Legal Reasoning Questions.

The Legal Aptitude or Legal Reasoning section in law entrance exams that holds maximum weightage and demands candidates to possess good knowledge of fundamentals. This section is used to test your legal awareness, analytical skills and problem-solving ability.