Legal Principle: Ignorance of Fact is excused but ignorance of law is not an excuse to criminal liability. Factual Situation: X was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the Airport of Bombay on 22 November 2014 it was found on searching that X carried 34 kg of gold bars on his person and that he had not declared it in the ‘Manifest for Transit’. On 24 November 2014, the Government of India had issued a notification modifying its earlier exemption, making it mandatory now that the gold must be declared in the ‘Manifest’ of the aircraft. Decision:

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 185  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
Legal Terms and Maxims Questions Based on Previous Papers — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.


Legal Principle: Ignorance of Fact is excused but ignorance of law is not an excuse to criminal liability. Factual Situation: X was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the Airport of Bombay on 22 November 2014 it was found on searching that X carried 34 kg of gold bars on his person and that he had not declared it in the ‘Manifest for Transit’. On 24 November 2014, the Government of India had issued a notification modifying its earlier exemption, making it mandatory now that the gold must be declared in the ‘Manifest’ of the aircraft. Decision:






ADVERTISEMENT