[question future/present interests 55] o conveys: "to a for life, then to the first of a's children to reach 30." A is 70, her only child, b, is 29. Does this violate the rule of perpituities?

🎲 Try a Random Question | Total Questions in Quiz: 1308 | 🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards

This question is part of a full practice quiz:

Law Knowledge Test — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.

🧠 Flashcards (fast review) 🧪 Practice Quiz ⚔️ Challenge a Friend 🥊 📊 View Stats

1. [question future/present interests 55] o conveys: "to a for life, then to the first of a's children to reach 30." A is 70, her only child, b, is 29. Does this violate the rule of perpituities?

A separate act. Limited partnership is governed by a statute separate from the (general) partnership act. The act, based on the uniform limited partnership act, was enacted several decades ago.
Sometimes, there is no legal requirement of written evidence of an alleged modification of a written contract. Resolve any legal issue of whether such written evidence of the modification is needed by (1) looking at the deal with the alleged change and (2) determining whether the deal with the alleged change would be within the statute of frauds. If the deal with the alleged change would be within the statute of frauds, then the alleged modification agreement must be in writing.
Fundamental rights: right to marry, right to procreate, right to custody of children, right to control child raising, right to contraceptives, right to interstate travel, right to vote
1) future interest? Contingent remainder 2) condition for vesting? A's first child >=30 3) measuring life? A (can't be b, not specific to b or b could die) 4) any possibility that this will not vest after a's death + 21 years? Yes b could die, and a could die while giving birth. Therefore we won't know within 21 years if a's new child reaches 30

[question future/present interests 55] o conveys: "to a for life, then to the first of a's children to reach 30." A is 70, her only child, b, is 29. Does this violate the rule of perpituities?

❤ If you liked Fatskills, consider supporting us by checking out The Life Manuals You Never Got.

About | Explore | User Guide | Topics | Subjects | Doubt Solver | Career Aptitude Test | Answers | Free Tools | What Should We Know?
Privacy | Terms |

Without work one finishes nothing. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
© 2026 Fatskills.com

All trademarks, logos and brand names are the property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement.

[question future/present interests 55] o conveys: "to a for life, then to the first of a's children to reach 30." A is 70, her only child, b, is 29. Does this violate the rule of perpituities?

❤ If you liked Fatskills, consider supporting us by checking out The Life Manuals You Never Got.

About | Explore | User Guide | Topics | Subjects | Doubt Solver | Career Aptitude Test | Answers | Free Tools | What Should We Know? Privacy | Terms |

Without work one finishes nothing. - Ralph Waldo Emerson© 2026 Fatskills.com

All trademarks, logos and brand names are the property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement.

About | Explore | User Guide | Topics | Subjects | Doubt Solver | Career Aptitude Test | Answers | Free Tools | What Should We Know?
Privacy | Terms |

Without work one finishes nothing. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
© 2026 Fatskills.com