Read Assertion (I) and Reason (II) and with the help of codes given below select the correct explanation.Assertion (I) : Section 95 of IPC is intended to prevent penalisation of negligible wrongs of trivial character because :Reasons (II) :(a) The injury is negligible.(b) The victim and the wrongdoer were related to each other.(c) The injured and the offender were not related by circumstances.(d) The nature of injury was very minor.Codes :

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 1104  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
UGC NTA NET JRF Law Previous Papers Questions — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.

1100+ questions on law.

UGC NET PAPER 2 Law syllabus consists of:

Constitutional and Administrative Law
Jurisprudence
Law of Crimes
Public International Law
Law of Torts and Consumer protection
Comparative public law and systems of governance
Intellectual property rights
Family Law
Environment and Human rights law


Read Assertion (I) and Reason (II) and with the help of codes given below select the correct explanation.<br />Assertion (I) : Section 95 of IPC is intended to prevent penalisation of negligible wrongs of trivial character because :<br />Reasons (II) :<br />(a) The injury is negligible.<br />(b) The victim and the wrongdoer were related to each other.<br />(c) The injured and the offender were not related by circumstances.<br />(d) The nature of injury was very minor.<br /><br />Codes :






ADVERTISEMENT