The main difference between Defacto and Dejure recognition is1. De-facto recognition may be withdrawn while De-jure recognition is full and final.2. Only De-jure recognised states can represent the old states, for the purpose of state succession.3. In De-jure recognition, formal diplomatic relations are established while in case of Defacto they may not be entered into.4. Former is legal and the latter is a factual recognition.

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 1104  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
UGC NTA NET JRF Law Previous Papers Questions — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.

1100+ questions on law.

UGC NET PAPER 2 Law syllabus consists of:

Constitutional and Administrative Law
Jurisprudence
Law of Crimes
Public International Law
Law of Torts and Consumer protection
Comparative public law and systems of governance
Intellectual property rights
Family Law
Environment and Human rights law


The main difference between Defacto and Dejure recognition is<br />1. De-facto recognition may be withdrawn while De-jure recognition is full and final.<br />2. Only De-jure recognised states can represent the old states, for the purpose of state succession.<br />3. In De-jure recognition, formal diplomatic relations are established while in case of Defacto they may not be entered into.<br />4. Former is legal and the latter is a factual recognition.