By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.
Individual factors shape how people recognize, interpret, and act on ethical issues in business. These include cognitive biases (systematic errors in thinking), locus of control (whether individuals believe they control outcomes or are controlled by external forces), and moral disengagement (mechanisms that allow people to act unethically without guilt). These factors explain why otherwise "good" people make unethical decisions—like Volkswagen engineers who cheated emissions tests (2015) or Wells Fargo employees who opened fake accounts (2016). Understanding these forces helps leaders design systems to counteract them (e.g., whistleblower protections, bias training, ethical leadership models).
Cognitive Biases (Kahneman & Tversky): Systematic deviations from rational judgment (e.g., confirmation bias—favoring info that supports preexisting beliefs). In business, this leads to ignoring red flags (e.g., Enron’s board overlooked accounting fraud because they trusted leadership). Relevance: Biases distort risk assessment, hiring, and compliance decisions.
Locus of Control (Rotter):
External locus: Belief that outcomes are controlled by fate/luck/others (e.g., "My boss made me falsify reports"). Relevance: Employees with internal locus are more likely to report misconduct (e.g., Sherron Watkins at Enron).
Moral Disengagement (Bandura): Eight mechanisms that allow people to act unethically without self-condemnation, such as:
Diffusion of responsibility ("Everyone in the department does it"). Relevance: Explains how normal people participate in atrocities (e.g., Nazi bureaucrats) or corporate scandals (e.g., Purdue Pharma’s opioid marketing).
Utilitarianism (Bentham/Mill): Maximize net benefit for the greatest number. Relevance: Used in layoff decisions (e.g., "Closing this plant saves 1,000 jobs elsewhere") but can justify harm to minorities (e.g., Ford Pinto’s cost-benefit analysis ignoring burn victims).
Deontology (Kant): Actions are ethical if they follow universal rules (e.g., "Don’t lie," "Respect autonomy"). Relevance: Underpins human rights policies (e.g., Nike’s shift from sweatshops to fair labor standards after Kantian critiques).
Virtue Ethics (Aristotle): Focus on moral character (e.g., integrity, courage) rather than rules or outcomes. Relevance: Explains why some leaders resist pressure (e.g., Paul Polman at Unilever rejecting quarterly earnings guidance to focus on long-term sustainability).
Justice Theory (Rawls): Fairness requires impartiality and protecting the least advantaged. Relevance: Guides policies like equal pay (e.g., Salesforce spending $16M to close gender pay gaps) or supply chain audits (e.g., Apple’s labor reforms in Foxconn factories).
Care Ethics (Gilligan): Ethics should prioritize relationships and empathy over abstract rules. Relevance: Used in HR (e.g., accommodating employees’ family needs) or crisis response (e.g., Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol recall prioritizing customer safety over profits).
Stakeholder Theory (Freeman): Businesses must balance the interests of all stakeholders (employees, customers, communities), not just shareholders. Relevance: Counters shareholder primacy (e.g., Patagonia’s "Earth is now our only shareholder" model).
Use the PLUS Ethical Decision-Making Model (adapted from the U.S. Department of Defense):
Example: Volkswagen’s emissions cheating violated the Clean Air Act and company values.
Legal: Does it comply with all applicable laws (e.g., FCPA, GDPR)?
Example: Wells Fargo’s fake accounts violated Dodd-Frank consumer protection rules.
Universal: Would this action be acceptable if everyone did it? (Kant’s categorical imperative)
Example: If every automaker cheated emissions tests, air quality would collapse.
Self: Does this align with my personal values and integrity?
Example: Sherron Watkins at Enron refused to "cook the books" despite pressure.
Stakeholders: Who is affected, and how? (Use stakeholder mapping.)
Example: Nike’s sweatshops harmed workers, customers (reputation), and investors (boycotts).
Publicity Test: Would I be comfortable if this decision were on the front page of the New York Times?
Why: Enron’s Jeff Skilling ignored warnings because he believed his "genius" justified risks.
Trap: Moral Disengagement (Bandura’s Mechanisms)
Why: Wells Fargo employees opened fake accounts because leadership framed it as "sales targets," not fraud.
Trap: Slippery Slope
Why: Volkswagen’s emissions cheating started with small tweaks to pass tests, then grew into a global scandal.
Trap: Ethical Relativism
Why: Siemens paid $1.6B in FCPA fines for bribing officials worldwide, arguing "it’s how business is done."
Trap: Diffusion of Responsibility
Justification: "Lying to customers violates universal principles and harms long-term relationships."
Scenario: A supplier in Bangladesh pays workers below a living wage. Your company’s code of conduct allows it if local laws are followed. Do you switch suppliers?
Join 4M+ learners. Unlock unlimited quizzes, wrong-answer tracking, flashcards + reminders, study guides, and 1-on-1 challenges.