Which of the following best describes the main idea of the passage below?The U.S. decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during World War II is a complex one that has received little examination by most ordinary American citizens. Many citizens are under the impression that the decision to use the bomb on Japan was primarily based on a desire to prevent a bloody and prolonged war on Japanese soil, with the view that the use of the bomb thus saved many more American lives – perhaps many more American and Japanese lives – that would otherwise have been lost. Much less considered, however, is the fact that prior to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United States government believed not only that Japan was losing the war, but that Japan was considering how best to surrender. Note: Japan was considering not whether to surrender, but under what conditions Japan could surrender. Viewed in this light, the U.S. decision to drop the bomb seems to have rather less to do with bringing a swift end to World War II than with the looming Cold War: in dropping the bomb, the United States demonstrated its power to the Soviet Union and its willingness to use that power. This casts a rather different perspective on the bombing, a perspective we would do well to consider in this age of terrorist threats and weapons of mass destruction. Under what circumstances is the use of such deadly weapons on civilians justified

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 121  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
CSET Social Science Practice 2 — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.


Which of the following best describes the main idea of the passage below?<br>The U.S. decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during World War II is a complex one that has received little examination by most ordinary American citizens. Many citizens are under the impression that the decision to use the bomb on Japan was primarily based on a desire to prevent a bloody and prolonged war on Japanese soil, with the view that the use of the bomb thus saved many more American lives – perhaps many more American and Japanese lives – that would otherwise have been lost. Much less considered, however, is the fact that prior to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United States government believed not only that Japan was losing the war, but that Japan was considering how best to surrender. Note: Japan was considering not whether to surrender, but under what conditions Japan could surrender. Viewed in this light, the U.S. decision to drop the bomb seems to have rather less to do with bringing a swift end to World War II than with the looming Cold War: in dropping the bomb, the United States demonstrated its power to the Soviet Union and its willingness to use that power. This casts a rather different perspective on the bombing, a perspective we would do well to consider in this age of terrorist threats and weapons of mass destruction. Under what circumstances is the use of such deadly weapons on civilians justified






ADVERTISEMENT