1. When the court has to ascertain the relationship between one person and another, the opinion of any person having special means of knowledge and expressed by conduct is admissible:

2. A dying declaration to be admissible:

3. Which of the following is the way to assess damage under Section 12, Indian Evidence Act? I. The damage suffered should be near as possible to the sum which will put the injured party in the same position as he would have been if he had not sustained the wrong for which he was awarded damages or compensation II. Damages are usually assessed on the basis of actual loss suffered and are called general or ordinary damages III. Where the plaintiff has not suffered any real damages by reason of breach of contract, normally, nominal damages are awarded IV. Special damages can be awarded for personal inconveniences or physical dis-comfort caused by the other party

4. A intentionally and falsely leads B to believe that certain land belongs to A, and thereby induces B to buy and pay for it. The land afterwards becomes the property of A, and A seeks to set aside the sale on the ground that, at the time of the sale, he had no title. Applying Section 115, Indian Evidence Act:

5. B, an accused wants to submit carbon copy of the suicide note as secondary evidence. The original is with the opposite party and he has failed to produce the same. The suicide was not within the knowledge of the accused prior to the receipt of carbon copy. Which of the following statements will hold true for the case?

6. To invoke the doctrine of estoppel which of the follow-ing condition must be satisfied?

7. The calling of at least one attesting witness to prove a document under section 68 is not necessary:

8. _______ section of the was inserted by the Criminal law (Amendment) Act, 2013.

9. The court may in its discretion call for proving the facts:

10. Section 132 of the Indian Evidence Act does not apply to a statement made by a person during an investigation under:

11. Which of the following statements hold true for section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

12. The principles of Section 44, Indian Evidence Act cannot be extended to which of the following?

13. In which of the following cases did the court held that a party who produces witnesses in court produces them as witnesses of truth; and simply because portions of their statements are not favourable to the party producing them, they cannot be condemned as biased witnesses?

14. In criminal cases under Section 54, Indian Evidence Act to prove that the defendant committed the crime charged evidence may not be given that he:

15. Proviso 1 to Section 33, Indian Evidence Act, not only covers cases of privity in estate and succession of title, but also cases where which of the following condition is met?

16. To invoke the doctrine of estoppel which of the following condition must be satisfied?

17. A will is required to be proved by calling at least one attesting witness:

18. Facts which need not be proved by the parties include:

19. Propositions under Evidence Act are: I. In civil cases, character evidence is inadmissible unless the character of a party is a fact in issue. II. In criminal cases, the evidence of good character is admissible generally. III. In criminal proceedings, evidence of bad character is inadmissible unless the same is a fact in issue. IV. In criminal proceedings evidence of bad character is admissible when evidence of good character has been given. In relation to the above propositions which of the following is correct statement:

20. The circumstances under which the secondary evidence is admissible have been enumerated in:

21. Contents of a document under section 59 of Evidence Act:

22. Public documents are mentioned in:

23. Which of the following section prescribe the method by which signature can be proved?

24. A is accused of a crime committed by him at Calcutta. He produces a letter written by himself and dated at Lahore on that day, and bearing the Lahore post-mark of that day. Applying Section 21, Indian Evidence Act, which of the following is possible?

25. Secondary evidence is admissible: