Home > Mechanical Engineering > Quizzes > Civil Rights And Civil Liberties Court Cases
Civil Rights And Civil Liberties Court Cases
Fast practice, instant feedback. Timer auto-submits when time’s up.
Avg score: 0% Most missed: “The Court ruled that the recitation in public classrooms of a non-denominational…”
civics
Civil Rights And Civil Liberties Court Cases
Time left 00:00
25 Questions

1. In this case - the Court ruled that the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was not unconstitutional.

2. Declared that a work is obscene and may be regulated by the gov if work taken as a whole appeals to prurient interests - work portrays sexual conduct in a patently offensive way and work taken as a whole lacks literary - artistic - political or scien

3. Court ruled that laws banning animal sacrifice were unconstitutional because they targeted the Santeria religion specifically.

4. The Court ruled that keeping drunk drivers off the roads may be an important governmental objective - but allowing women aged eighteen to twenty-one to drink alcoholic beverages while prohibiting men of the same age from drinking is not substantially

5. Nonverbal communication - such as burning a flag or wearing an armband. The Supreme Court has accorded some symbolic speech protection under the first amendment.

6. Man claimed that the court should not find him guilty of polygamy since it was his religious duty. The court disagreed. [Free exercise]

7. The Court overturned the conviction of a director of a Communist youth camp under a state statute prohibiting the display of a red flag.

8. Students may be searched by school administrators if they have reasonable belief---this is a lower standard than probable cause.

9. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement

10. Tightened restrictions on foreign-born Americans and limited speech [free speech]

11. A policy permitting student-led - student-initiated prayer at football games violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment [est. clause and schools]

12. Case wherein the Supreme Court adopted the exclusionary rule - which bars the use of illegally obtained evidence at trial.

13. Established exclusionary rule [4th amendment]; Fremont Weeks was suspected of using the mail system to distribute chances in a lottery - which was considered gambling and was illegal in Missouri. State agents entered his home - searched his room - an

14. Incorporated a portion of the Fourth Amendment by establishing that illegally obtained evidence cannot be sued at trial.

15. The Court reversed its 1986 ruling in Bowers v. Hardwick by finding a Texas statute that banned sodomy to be unconstitutional.

16. Challenged a Louisiana statute requiring that railroads provide separate but equal accommodations for blacks and whites. The Court found that separate but equal accommodations did not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

17. The Supreme Court ruled that all vestiges of de jure discrimination must be eliminated at once.

18. The confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment does not guarantee defendants an absolute right to come face to face with their accusers.

19. Turned the tide in terms of constitutional litigation - ruling that the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibited unreasonable classifications based on sex.

20. Religious organization can obtain federal grants to help solve societal problems [exception to lemon v. kurtzman]

21. Due process in suspension or expulsion

22. The arm band in schools case; First Amendment applied to public schools - and that administrators would have to demonstrate constitutionally valid reasons for any specific regulation of speech in the classroom. [symbolic speech]

23. By ruling that a state law violated the freedom of the press - the Supreme Court incorporated the free press provision of the First Amendment.

24. Limitation on the scope of Tinker ruling. prohibiting certain styles of expression that are sexually vulgar.

25. This decision expanded the types of beliefs that can be used to get conscientious objector status. The depth and fervency of the beliefs - rather than their status as part of an established religious system - became fundamental to determining which v