By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.
A Hyper-Practical, Zero-Fluff Study Guide
You’re a Scrum Master or Product Owner on a team that just inherited a legacy project with no historical data. The CTO asks, "When will we hit MVP?" Your gut says "3 months," but stakeholders want hard dates. Velocity, burndown/burn-up charts, and forecasting are your superpowers here—they turn gut feelings into data-driven predictions.
Why this matters in production: - Without velocity, you’re guessing. Guessing leads to missed deadlines, overpromising, and death marches. - Without burndown/burn-up charts, you can’t spot blockers early. Teams waste sprints "hoping" they’ll catch up. - Without forecasting, you can’t answer "When will Feature X ship?" with confidence. Stakeholders lose trust.
Real-world scenario: You’re leading a cloud migration. The team says, "We’ll finish in 6 sprints." But after Sprint 1, you realize they’re completing only 20 story points instead of the planned 40. Do you: A) Hope they’ll magically double output next sprint? B) Use velocity to adjust forecasts and reset expectations? (Spoiler: B is the only way to avoid a death march.)
Day 1: 40 points Day 5: 25 points Day 10: 0 points (ideal)
Sprint 1: 30/50 points Sprint 2: 60/70 points (scope increased by 20)
Forecast = (Total Backlog Points) / (Average Velocity)
Sprint 1: 30 Sprint 2: 35 Sprint 3: 28 Sprint 4: 32 Sprint 5: 31
(30 + 35 + 28 + 32 + 31) / 5 = 31.2-31 points (round down)
Feature A: 21 Feature B: 13 Feature C: 8 Bugs: 5 Tech Debt: 3 Total = 50 points
50 points / 31 velocity = 1.6 sprints-2 sprints
Open Excel and create a table: | Sprint | Completed | Total Scope | |--------|-----------|-------------| | 1 | 30 | 50 | | 2 | 60 | 50 | (Note: "Total Scope" can increase if new work is added.)
Insert a line chart:
Lines: "Completed" and "Total Scope"
Interpretation:
Correct: "The average number of story points a team completes per sprint, used for forecasting."
"When should you use a burn-up vs. burndown chart?"
Correct: "Use burn-ups when scope changes frequently (e.g., product backlog). Use burndowns for fixed-scope sprints."
"How do you forecast a backlog?"
Correct: "Divide total backlog points by the team’s average velocity (last 3–5 sprints)."
"What’s the biggest risk of using velocity for performance reviews?"
Trap: Forecasting with capacity instead of velocity.
Burndown vs. Burn-up:
Trap: Using a burndown for a release with changing scope.
Story Points vs. Hours:
"Your team’s velocity is 30 points/sprint. The backlog has 150 points. Stakeholders want it done in 4 sprints. What do you do?" --Wrong: "Work harder!" --Correct: 1. Forecast: 150 / 30 = 5 sprints. 2. Communicate: "We’ll finish in 5 sprints. To hit 4, we’d need to reduce scope by 30 points or increase velocity (unlikely)." 3. Options: - Negotiate scope. - Add team members (but this may slow velocity short-term). - Accept the 5-sprint timeline.
Challenge: Your team’s last 5 sprints: [25, 30, 28, 32, 29]. The backlog has 200 points. Forecast the completion date using:1. Simple average velocity.2. Yesterday’s weather (last 3 sprints).3. Monte Carlo (simulate 100 sprints using random sampling).
Solution:1. Simple average: (25 + 30 + 28 + 32 + 29) / 5 = 28.8-29 points/sprint 200 / 29 = 6.9-7 sprints
(25 + 30 + 28 + 32 + 29) / 5 = 28.8-29 points/sprint
200 / 29 = 6.9-7 sprints
Yesterday’s weather: (28 + 32 + 29) / 3 = 29.6-30 points/sprint 200 / 30 = 6.6-7 sprints
(28 + 32 + 29) / 3 = 29.6-30 points/sprint
200 / 30 = 6.6-7 sprints
Monte Carlo (Excel):
=RANDBETWEEN(25,32)
Why it works: - Simple average is easy but noisy. - Yesterday’s weather is more stable. - Monte Carlo gives a range, not a single number.
Total Backlog / Velocity = Sprints
Final Pro Tip: "Velocity is like a car’s speedometer—it tells you how fast you’re going, not how far you’ll get. Always pair it with a map (backlog) and a destination (goal)."
Join 4M+ learners. Unlock unlimited quizzes, wrong-answer tracking, flashcards + reminders, study guides, and 1-on-1 challenges.