1. For the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, the courts can issue

2. The term of the Lok Sabha

3. Right to Education viz. Article 21 A was added in the Constitution by the:

4. Principle: He, who goes to the court of law to seek justice, must come with clean hands. Facts: P enters into a contract with S under which S has to construct a house for P and has to complete the same within one year from the date of the contract. This contract includes two very important terms. According to the first term, if there is price hike of the materials to be used in the construction, then the escalation charges at a particular rate shall be payable by P to S. According to second term, if the construction of the house is not completed within the period prescribed for it, then S will have to pay penalty at a particular rate to P. Before the completion of the construction work, the workers of S go on strike and strike continues up to three months even after the expiry of one year. After that period, workers return and the construction work against starts. During the last three months period of strike, there was a considerable rise in the price of the building material. S claimed escalation cost from P. P did not agree to it. S filed a suit in the court of law either to order the payment of the price of the building material on the basis of escalated price or to allow him to stop the work without incurring any penal liability towards P.

5. Principle: Strike is a collective stoppage of work by workmen undertaken in order to bring pressure upon those who depend on the sale or use of the products of work, whereas lock-out is a weapon in the hands of the employer, similar to that of strike in the armoury of workmen, used for compelling persons employed by him to accept his terms or conditions of or affecting employment. While in closure there is permanent closing down of a place of employment or part thereof, in lay-off an employer, who is willing to employ, fails or refuses or is unable to provide employment for reasons beyond his control. Facts: Workmen of a textile factory went on strike as per law, demanding the payment of bonus. Employer of the factory refused to pay any extra allowances, including bonus and besides he closed down the factory till the strike was stopped.

6. The Fundamental Rights are

7. Which one of the following steps cannot be taken by the President during the Financial Emergency? (NLU DELHI 2009)

8. Which of the following does not constitute an exception to the provision of Article 14 (‘equally before the law’)?

9. A political party is recognized by the Election Commission only if
I. it has been engaged in political activity for a continuous period of five years. II. has returned for every 25 members of the Lok Sabha for every 25 members of that House or any fraction of that number elected from that State. III. has polled not less than six per cent of the total number of valid votes polled by all contesting candidates at the general elections. IV. has contested elections in four or more states in three consecutive general elections.

10. Which of the following qualification is required to be elected as the President of India? (SET LAW 2011)

11. Lease agreement is a form of: (DU 3-YR LL.B. 2009)

12. Theft is offence against

13. The President of India is elected for

14. The Supreme Court of India was set up

15. Ejusdem generis means:

16. What is a ‘Moot Court’?

17. A, by letter, offers to sell his house to B for 2,00,000. Without knowing of A’s offer, B, by a letter, offers to buy the same house from A for 2,00,000. (SET LAW 2012)

18. An ordinance promulgated by the President

19. Which of the following High Courts covers more than one State/Union Territories?

20. The administrators of Union Territories are designated as

21. A Judge of the Supreme Court of India or High Court of any state can be removed by the President of India only

22. India is a Secular state because

23. The Constitution of India was ordained by

24. The term of office of a judge of the International Court of Justice is: (NLU DELHI 2008)

25. In which case, Supreme Court held the Parliament has no power to amend Fundamental Rights?