Fatskills
Practice. Master. Repeat.
Study Guide: CPA AUD: Special Topics - Subsequent Events - Recognised vs Non-Recognised, Type I vs Type II
Source: https://www.fatskills.com/cpa/chapter/cpa-aud-special-topics-subsequent-events-recognised-vs-non-recognised-type-i-vs-type-ii

CPA AUD: Special Topics - Subsequent Events - Recognised vs Non-Recognised, Type I vs Type II

By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.

⏱️ ~9 min read

What Is It?

Subsequent Events: Recognised vs Non-Recognised — Type I vs Type II This topic deals with the accounting treatment of subsequent events in financial reporting, specifically the recognition and measurement of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued.

Why Does the Exam Ask This?

The exam asks this topic to assess the learner's ability to apply professional judgment and compliance logic in accounting for subsequent events, which is a critical aspect of financial reporting.

What Do I Need to Know First?

  • Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 855, Subsequent Events
  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) guidance on subsequent events
  • Conceptual framework for financial reporting

Topic Snapshot

Subsequent events are a critical aspect of financial reporting, and the accounting treatment of these events can have a significant impact on the accuracy and reliability of financial statements. This topic is essential for learners to understand the different types of subsequent events, how to recognize and measure them, and the implications for financial reporting.

Exam / Job / Audit Weighting

Frequency: 2-3 questions per exam Difficulty Rating: Intermediate Question Type or Real-World Task Type: Multiple-choice questions, case studies, and scenario-based questions

Difficulty Level

intermediate

Must-Know Rules, Formulas, Standards, or Principles

  1. ASC 855 requires that subsequent events be recognized and disclosed in the financial statements if they provide evidence of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date.
  2. Type I subsequent events are those that provide new information about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, while Type II subsequent events are those that require a change in accounting estimate or in the reporting of a loss that did not exist at the balance sheet date.
  3. The FASB requires that subsequent events be evaluated at the date of the financial statements and at the date of issuance to ensure that all relevant information is considered.

Misconceptions

  • That subsequent events only apply to financial statements that are issued within a short period after the balance sheet date.
  • That all subsequent events are Type II events.
  • That subsequent events only apply to losses, not gains.
  • That subsequent events are only relevant for financial reporting purposes.
  • That the accounting treatment for subsequent events is the same for all types of entities.

Common Mistakes

  • Failing to recognize a Type I subsequent event.
  • Incorrectly classifying a subsequent event as Type II when it is actually Type I.
  • Failing to disclose a subsequent event in the financial statements.
  • Incorrectly applying the accounting treatment for a subsequent event.
  • Failing to consider the implications of a subsequent event on the financial statements.

The Common Trap

The most common trap is failing to recognize a Type I subsequent event or incorrectly classifying it as Type II.

Terms to Remember

  • Subsequent event
  • Type I subsequent event
  • Type II subsequent event
  • Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 855
  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
  • Conceptual framework for financial reporting

Step-by-Step Process

  1. Identify the type of subsequent event (Type I or Type II).
  2. Evaluate the event at the date of the financial statements and at the date of issuance.
  3. Apply the accounting treatment for the subsequent event, as required by ASC 855.
  4. Disclose the subsequent event in the financial statements, as required by ASC 855.
  5. Consider the implications of the subsequent event on the financial statements.

Exam Answer Builder

1-mark Question

What is the primary purpose of ASC 855? - To provide guidance on the accounting treatment for subsequent events. - To define the term "subsequent event." - To require the disclosure of subsequent events in the financial statements. - To provide a framework for evaluating subsequent events.

Correct Answer: a

Explanation: ASC 855 provides guidance on the accounting treatment for subsequent events.

2-mark Question

What is the difference between a Type I and Type II subsequent event? - A Type I subsequent event provides new information about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, while a Type II subsequent event requires a change in accounting estimate or in the reporting of a loss that did not exist at the balance sheet date. - A Type I subsequent event requires a change in accounting estimate or in the reporting of a loss that did not exist at the balance sheet date, while a Type II subsequent event provides new information about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date. - A Type I subsequent event is a loss that did not exist at the balance sheet date, while a Type II subsequent event is a gain that did not exist at the balance sheet date. - A Type I subsequent event is a gain that did not exist at the balance sheet date, while a Type II subsequent event is a loss that did not exist at the balance sheet date.

Correct Answer: a

Explanation: A Type I subsequent event provides new information about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, while a Type II subsequent event requires a change in accounting estimate or in the reporting of a loss that did not exist at the balance sheet date.

5-mark Question

A company discovers that it has a liability that was not previously disclosed in the financial statements. The liability was incurred on the balance sheet date, but the company did not discover it until after the balance sheet date. What is the accounting treatment for this liability? - Recognize the liability as a Type I subsequent event and disclose it in the financial statements. - Recognize the liability as a Type II subsequent event and apply the accounting treatment for a change in accounting estimate. - Do not recognize the liability as a subsequent event, as it was incurred on the balance sheet date. - Do not disclose the liability in the financial statements, as it was discovered after the balance sheet date.

Correct Answer: a

Explanation: The liability is a Type I subsequent event, as it provides new information about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date. The company must recognize the liability and disclose it in the financial statements.

This vs That

Subsequent events are often confused with other accounting topics, such as changes in accounting estimates or corrections of prior period errors. However, subsequent events are a distinct accounting concept that requires a separate analysis and accounting treatment.

Time-Saver Hack

When evaluating subsequent events, focus on the type of event (Type I or Type II) and the accounting treatment required by ASC 855. This will help you to quickly determine the correct accounting treatment and avoid common mistakes.

Mini Scenarios

Scenario 1

A company discovers that it has a liability that was not previously disclosed in the financial statements. The liability was incurred on the balance sheet date, but the company did not discover it until after the balance sheet date.

  • What is the accounting treatment for this liability?
  • Should the company recognize the liability as a Type I or Type II subsequent event?

Correct Answer: Type I subsequent event

Explanation: The liability is a Type I subsequent event, as it provides new information about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date.

Scenario 2

A company decides to change its accounting estimate for depreciation, which will result in a lower expense in the current period. The change in accounting estimate was made after the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements were issued.

  • What is the accounting treatment for this change in accounting estimate?
  • Should the company recognize the change in accounting estimate as a Type I or Type II subsequent event?

Correct Answer: Type II subsequent event

Explanation: The change in accounting estimate is a Type II subsequent event, as it requires a change in accounting estimate.

Scenario 3

A company discovers that it has a gain that was not previously disclosed in the financial statements. The gain was incurred on the balance sheet date, but the company did not discover it until after the balance sheet date.

  • What is the accounting treatment for this gain?
  • Should the company recognize the gain as a Type I or Type II subsequent event?

Correct Answer: Do not recognize the gain as a subsequent event

Explanation: The gain is not a subsequent event, as it was incurred on the balance sheet date.

Diagnostic MCQ Bank

Question 1

What is the primary purpose of ASC 855? - To provide guidance on the accounting treatment for subsequent events. - To define the term "subsequent event." - To require the disclosure of subsequent events in the financial statements. - To provide a framework for evaluating subsequent events.

Correct Answer: a

Explanation: ASC 855 provides guidance on the accounting treatment for subsequent events.

Question 2

What is the difference between a Type I and Type II subsequent event? - A Type I subsequent event provides new information about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, while a Type II subsequent event requires a change in accounting estimate or in the reporting of a loss that did not exist at the balance sheet date. - A Type I subsequent event requires a change in accounting estimate or in the reporting of a loss that did not exist at the balance sheet date, while a Type II subsequent event provides new information about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date. - A Type I subsequent event is a loss that did not exist at the balance sheet date, while a Type II subsequent event is a gain that did not exist at the balance sheet date. - A Type I subsequent event is a gain that did not exist at the balance sheet date, while a Type II subsequent event is a loss that did not exist at the balance sheet date.

Correct Answer: a

Explanation: A Type I subsequent event provides new information about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, while a Type II subsequent event requires a change in accounting estimate or in the reporting of a loss that did not exist at the balance sheet date.

Question 3

A company discovers that it has a liability that was not previously disclosed in the financial statements. The liability was incurred on the balance sheet date, but the company did not discover it until after the balance sheet date. What is the accounting treatment for this liability? - Recognize the liability as a Type I subsequent event and disclose it in the financial statements. - Recognize the liability as a Type II subsequent event and apply the accounting treatment for a change in accounting estimate. - Do not recognize the liability as a subsequent event, as it was incurred on the balance sheet date. - Do not disclose the liability in the financial statements, as it was discovered after the balance sheet date.

Correct Answer: a

Explanation: The liability is a Type I subsequent event, as it provides new information about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date.

Real-World Patterns

Subsequent events often show up in real-world situations, such as when a company discovers a liability or gain that was not previously disclosed in the financial statements. This can occur when a company is involved in a lawsuit, has a change in ownership, or experiences a significant event that affects its financial position.

30-Second Cheat Sheet

  • Subsequent events are a critical aspect of financial reporting.
  • There are two types of subsequent events: Type I and Type II.
  • Type I subsequent events provide new information about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date.
  • Type II subsequent events require a change in accounting estimate or in the reporting of a loss that did not exist at the balance sheet date.
  • ASC 855 provides guidance on the accounting treatment for subsequent events.

Related Concepts

  • Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 855
  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
  • Conceptual framework for financial reporting
  • Changes in accounting estimates
  • Corrections of prior period errors

Verified Source List

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
  • Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 855
  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
  • Institute of Management Accountants (IMA)
  • OpenStax
  • Khan Academy


ADVERTISEMENT