The outcome of the Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court case in 1964 is significant for those under arrest because now, once someone is both in police custody and about to be interrogated, police are required to

Use the following information for Questions below.     The Fifth and Sixth Amendments were part of the Bill of Rights (1791), which protects individual freedoms from the powers of federal government. The Fifth Amendment focuses on procedural safeguards designed to protect the rights of the criminally accused and includes the phrase “no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” The Sixth Amendment guarantees a citizen a speedy trial, a fair jury, an attorney if the accused person wants one, and the chance to confront the witnesses accusing the defendant... Show more

Use the following information for Questions below.    

The Fifth and Sixth Amendments were part of the Bill of Rights (1791), which protects individual freedoms from the powers of federal government. The Fifth Amendment focuses on procedural safeguards designed to protect the rights of the criminally accused and includes the phrase “no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”

The Sixth Amendment guarantees a citizen a speedy trial, a fair jury, an attorney if the accused person wants one, and the chance to confront the witnesses accusing the defendant of a crime.    

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.    
 

Show less