By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.
Mastering metallurgy in IIT JEE unlocks 5-7 marks—enough to push you from a 90 to a 99+ percentile. Whether it’s predicting which metal can reduce another using the Ellingham diagram, choosing between roasting vs. calcination, or applying electrode potentials to extract metals, this topic appears every year in both JEE Main and Advanced.
Question: Can carbon (C) reduce ZnO at 1000 K? Given: - Zn + ½O₂ → ZnO (ΔG° = -300 kJ/mol at 1000 K) - C + ½O₂ → CO (ΔG° = -200 kJ/mol at 1000 K)
Solution:1. Write the reduction reaction: ZnO + C → Zn + CO2. Calculate ΔG° for the reaction: - ΔG° = ΔG°(CO) – ΔG°(ZnO) - ΔG° = (-200) – (-300) = +100 kJ/mol3. Since ΔG° > 0 → Non-spontaneous. Answer: No, carbon cannot reduce ZnO at 1000 K.
What we did and why: - We combined the two half-reactions to find the overall ΔG°. - Positive ΔG° means the reaction is not spontaneous under standard conditions.
Question: Will aluminium (Al) reduce copper ions (Cu²⁺) in solution? Given: - E°(Al³⁺/Al) = -1.66 V - E°(Cu²⁺/Cu) = +0.34 V
Solution:1. Write the half-reactions: - Oxidation: Al → Al³⁺ + 3e⁻ (E° = +1.66 V, reversed sign) - Reduction: Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻ → Cu (E° = +0.34 V)2. Balance electrons (multiply Al reaction by 2, Cu by 3): - 2Al → 2Al³⁺ + 6e⁻ (E° = +1.66 V) - 3Cu²⁺ + 6e⁻ → 3Cu (E° = +0.34 V)3. Calculate E°_cell: - E°_cell = E°_cathode – E°_anode = 0.34 – (-1.66) = +2.00 V4. Since E°_cell > 0 → Spontaneous. Answer: Yes, Al will reduce Cu²⁺ to Cu.
What we did and why: - We balanced electrons to ensure the same number in both half-reactions. - Positive E°_cell means the reaction is spontaneous (Al is a stronger reducing agent than Cu).
Question: Bauxite (Al₂O₃.2H₂O) is purified via Bayer’s process. Then, Al₂O₃ is reduced to Al using electrolysis. Why is carbon reduction not used for Al₂O₃? Given: - Ellingham diagram shows Al₂O₃ line is very low (ΔG° << 0). - E°(Al³⁺/Al) = -1.66 V.
Solution:1. Ellingham Diagram Check: - Al₂O₃ line is below C → CO₂ line at all T. - ΔG° for Al₂O₃ formation is very negative → Very stable oxide. - Carbon cannot reduce Al₂O₃ because its line is above Al₂O₃’s line.2. Electrode Potential Check: - Al has a very negative E° (-1.66 V) → Strong reducing agent. - No common reducing agent (C, H₂) has a more negative E° than Al.3. Conclusion: - Carbon reduction is not thermodynamically feasible. - Electrolysis is the only viable method (Hall-Héroult process). Answer: Al₂O₃ is too stable; carbon reduction is not spontaneous. Electrolysis is required.
What we did and why: - We used both Ellingham and electrode potential to justify why carbon fails. - Stable oxides (low ΔG°) require electrolysis for reduction.
"Listen up—this is how you crush metallurgy in JEE:
Carbon (C → CO₂) line slopes down; Al₂O₃ line is very low → carbon can’t reduce Al₂O₃.
Roasting vs. Calcination:
Calcination = Carbonate/hydrated ores → Oxides + CO₂/H₂O (e.g., CaCO₃ → CaO).
Electrode Potential (E°):
If E°_cell > 0 → spontaneous reduction.
Leaching:
Exam tricks: - Ellingham questions? Write the reaction first. - E° questions? Balance electrons before calculating. - Al₂O₃? Electrolysis only—carbon won’t work.
Now go ace that exam!
Join 4M+ learners. Unlock unlimited quizzes, wrong-answer tracking, flashcards + reminders, study guides, and 1-on-1 challenges.