By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.
Requirements vs Design is the discipline of distinguishing what the business needs (business, stakeholder, and solution requirements) from how the solution will satisfy those needs (design). In the BA lifecycle the BA elicits, analyzes, and documents requirements; the design (often produced by architects or developers) translates those requirements into a concrete solution blueprint.
Real?world example: A bank wants a new Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system to improve sales?lead tracking. The BA captures business requirements (e.g., “increase cross?sell rate by 15?%”), stakeholder requirements (e.g., “sales reps need a mobile view of leads”), and solution requirements (e.g., “the system shall provide a REST API for mobile access”). The design then defines the technical architecture, data model, and UI wireframes that will deliver those solution requirements.
Scenario: After a stakeholder workshop, the sales team says “we need the lead list exported to Excel” while the compliance team says “the export must be encrypted.” Which BABOK artifact should the BA create to capture both needs? Answer: Solution Requirements Specification (functional requirement for export + non?functional requirement for encryption). Justification: Both statements describe how the solution must behave; they belong to functional and non?functional solution requirements, not business or stakeholder requirements.
Scenario: The project sponsor asks the BA to show a visual mock?up of the new CRM’s home page before any functional requirements are approved. What should the BA do? Answer: Create a Wireframe/Prototype after baseline requirements are signed off, and use it to validate the solution requirements, not as a requirement itself. Justification: Design artifacts support validation but do not replace the need for approved requirements; the BA must not treat the wireframe as a requirement.
Scenario: During requirements validation, a stakeholder objects that a functional requirement conflicts with a regulatory non?functional requirement. Which technique helps resolve the conflict? Answer: MoSCoW Prioritization (or any prioritization technique) to negotiate “Must” vs. “Should” items and achieve consensus. Justification: Prioritization clarifies which requirement is non?negotiable (regulatory) and which can be adjusted.
Good luck – you now have the practical map to navigate Requirements vs Design and ace the IIBA exams!
Join 4M+ learners. Unlock unlimited quizzes, wrong-answer tracking, flashcards + reminders, study guides, and 1-on-1 challenges.