Should there be recruitment in banks on the basis of past academic performances rather than through competitive examinations? Arguments I.Yes. It will be beneficial for those candidates who are unable to bear the expenses of competitive examinations. II.No. The past academic performance cannot be made the basis of recruitment because there is no uniformity in the assessment by the universities.

🎲 Try a Random Question  |  Total Questions in Quiz: 56  |  🧠 Study this quiz with Flashcards
This question is part of a full practice quiz:
Arguments (Strong / Weak) — practice the complete quiz, review flashcards, or try a random question.

In making decisions about important questions, you should be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.    


Should there be recruitment in banks on the basis of past academic performances rather than through competitive examinations? Arguments I.Yes. It will be beneficial for those candidates who are unable to bear the expenses of competitive examinations. II.No. The past academic performance cannot be made the basis of recruitment because there is no uniformity in the assessment by the universities.