Fatskills
Practice. Master. Repeat.
Study Guide: GED Reasoning Through Language Arts: Reading Comprehension, Non-Fiction, Evaluating Arguments, Logical Fallacies, Bias, Credibility
Source: https://www.fatskills.com/general-equivalency-diploma-ged/chapter/ged-reasoning-through-language-arts-reading-comprehension-non-fiction-evaluating-arguments-logical-fallacies-bias-credibility

GED Reasoning Through Language Arts: Reading Comprehension, Non-Fiction, Evaluating Arguments, Logical Fallacies, Bias, Credibility

By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.

⏱️ ~10 min read

What Is This?

Reading Comprehension — Non-Fiction: Evaluating Arguments — Logical Fallacies, Bias, Credibility is the ability to critically analyze and evaluate the arguments, credibility, and biases presented in non-fiction texts. This skill is essential for exams, job roles, and everyday life, as it enables you to make informed decisions and distinguish between credible and unreliable sources.

This topic appears in exams to test your ability to think critically, identify biases, and recognize logical fallacies. You can expect to encounter questions that require you to analyze arguments, evaluate credibility, and identify biases in various types of texts.

Why It Matters

This topic is commonly tested in exams such as the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT), Graduate Record Examination (GRE), and Law School Admission Test (LSAT). It typically carries 15-30% of the total marks and is a significant component of the exam. The examiner is testing your ability to think critically, evaluate arguments, and recognize biases, which are essential skills for success in graduate school, law school, and professional life.

Core Concepts

To master this topic, you need to understand the following core concepts:

  • Logical Fallacies: Errors in reasoning that make an argument invalid or misleading.
  • Bias: A preconceived opinion or attitude that influences your interpretation of information.
  • Credibility: The trustworthiness and reliability of a source or argument.
  • Evaluating Arguments: The process of analyzing and assessing the validity and strength of an argument.
  • Signal Words: Words or phrases that indicate the presence of a logical fallacy or bias.

Prerequisites

Before tackling this topic, you need to have a solid understanding of:

  • Critical Thinking: The ability to analyze and evaluate information objectively.
  • Argumentation Theory: The study of the structure and validity of arguments.
  • Rhetoric: The art of using language effectively to persuade or convince others.

If you lack these prerequisites, you may struggle to understand the concepts and rules presented in this guide.

The Rule-Book (How It Works)

The primary rule is:

  • The burden of proof: The person making a claim or argument must provide evidence to support it.

Sub-rules and exceptions include:

  • The fallacy of assumption: Assuming a fact without evidence.
  • The fallacy of ad hominem: Attacking the person making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself.
  • The fallacy of straw man: Misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack.

A simple visual pattern to remember is:

Fallacy Description Example
Ad Hominem Attacking the person "You're just saying that because you're a Democrat."
Straw Man Misrepresenting an opponent's argument "You think we should just give up on climate change and let the Earth burn."
False Dilemma Presenting only two options when there are more "You're either with us or against us."

Exam / Job / Audit Weighting

Frequency: 20-30% Difficulty Rating: Intermediate Question Type or Real-World Task Type: Multiple-choice questions, short-answer questions, and essay questions.

Difficulty Level

Intermediate

Must-Know Rules, Formulas, Standards, or Principles

The three most important rules for this topic are:

  1. The burden of proof: The person making a claim or argument must provide evidence to support it.
  2. The fallacy of assumption: Assuming a fact without evidence.
  3. The fallacy of ad hominem: Attacking the person making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself.

Worked Examples (Step-by-Step)

Easy

Question: Which of the following is an example of a logical fallacy? A) The sun rises in the east. B) The company's profits are increasing due to the new marketing strategy. C) The new policy is a good idea because it's been implemented in other countries. D) The CEO is a good leader because he has a strong track record of success.

Answer: C) The new policy is a good idea because it's been implemented in other countries. Key rule applied: The fallacy of appeal to authority.

Medium

Question: Which of the following is an example of a bias? A) The article presents a balanced view of the issue. B) The author has a clear opinion on the topic. C) The article cites credible sources to support its claims. D) The author uses loaded language to influence the reader's opinion.

Answer: D) The author uses loaded language to influence the reader's opinion. Key rule applied: The definition of bias.

Hard

Question: Which of the following is an example of a false dilemma? A) We can either invest in renewable energy or continue to rely on fossil fuels. B) We can either increase taxes or cut public services. C) We can either support the new policy or oppose it. D) We can either invest in education or invest in healthcare.

Answer: A) We can either invest in renewable energy or continue to rely on fossil fuels. Key rule applied: The definition of false dilemma.

Common Exam Traps & Mistakes

Trap 1: Failing to identify biases

Mistake: Assuming that a source is objective when it's actually biased. Wrong answer: "The article presents a balanced view of the issue." Correct approach: "The article uses loaded language to influence the reader's opinion."

Trap 2: Failing to recognize logical fallacies

Mistake: Assuming that an argument is valid when it's actually flawed. Wrong answer: "The new policy is a good idea because it's been implemented in other countries." Correct approach: "The fallacy of appeal to authority is present in this argument."

Trap 3: Failing to evaluate credibility

Mistake: Assuming that a source is credible when it's actually unreliable. Wrong answer: "The article cites credible sources to support its claims." Correct approach: "The article cites sources that are not credible."

Trap 4: Failing to analyze arguments

Mistake: Assuming that an argument is valid without analyzing its structure. Wrong answer: "The argument is valid because it's well-written." Correct approach: "The argument is flawed because it relies on assumptions."

Trap 5: Failing to identify signal words

Mistake: Failing to recognize words or phrases that indicate a logical fallacy or bias. Wrong answer: "The article presents a balanced view of the issue." Correct approach: "The article uses loaded language to influence the reader's opinion."

Shortcut Strategies & Exam Hacks

Memory Aid

Use the acronym FALLACIES to remember the most common logical fallacies: F - False Dilemma A - Ad Hominem L - Loaded Language L - Lack of Evidence A - Appeal to Authority C - Circular Reasoning I - Irrelevant Information E - Emotional Appeal S - Straw Man

Elimination Strategy

Eliminate options that are clearly incorrect or irrelevant to the question.

Pattern Recognition Tip

Look for signal words or phrases that indicate a logical fallacy or bias.

Question-Type Taxonomy

Format 1: Multiple-Choice Questions

Example: Which of the following is an example of a logical fallacy? A) The sun rises in the east. B) The company's profits are increasing due to the new marketing strategy. C) The new policy is a good idea because it's been implemented in other countries. D) The CEO is a good leader because he has a strong track record of success.

Format 2: Short-Answer Questions

Example: What is an example of a bias in the following article? "The article presents a balanced view of the issue."

Format 3: Essay Questions

Example: Analyze the argument presented in the following article and identify any logical fallacies or biases.

Format 4: Case Studies

Example: Evaluate the credibility of the sources cited in the following article and identify any biases or logical fallacies.

Practice Set (MCQs)

Question 1

Which of the following is an example of a logical fallacy? A) The company's profits are increasing due to the new marketing strategy. B) The new policy is a good idea because it's been implemented in other countries. C) The CEO is a good leader because he has a strong track record of success. D) The article presents a balanced view of the issue.

Options

A) The company's profits are increasing due to the new marketing strategy. B) The new policy is a good idea because it's been implemented in other countries. C) The CEO is a good leader because he has a strong track record of success. D) The article presents a balanced view of the issue.

Correct Answer

B) The new policy is a good idea because it's been implemented in other countries.

Explanation

The correct answer is B) The new policy is a good idea because it's been implemented in other countries. This is an example of the fallacy of appeal to authority.

Why the Distractors Are Tempting

A) The company's profits are increasing due to the new marketing strategy is a true statement, but it's not an example of a logical fallacy. C) The CEO is a good leader because he has a strong track record of success is a true statement, but it's not an example of a logical fallacy. D) The article presents a balanced view of the issue is a true statement, but it's not an example of a logical fallacy.

Question 2

Which of the following is an example of a bias? A) The article presents a balanced view of the issue. B) The author has a clear opinion on the topic. C) The article cites credible sources to support its claims. D) The author uses loaded language to influence the reader's opinion.

Options

A) The article presents a balanced view of the issue. B) The author has a clear opinion on the topic. C) The article cites credible sources to support its claims. D) The author uses loaded language to influence the reader's opinion.

Correct Answer

D) The author uses loaded language to influence the reader's opinion.

Explanation

The correct answer is D) The author uses loaded language to influence the reader's opinion. This is an example of a bias.

Why the Distractors Are Tempting

A) The article presents a balanced view of the issue is a true statement, but it's not an example of a bias. B) The author has a clear opinion on the topic is a true statement, but it's not an example of a bias. C) The article cites credible sources to support its claims is a true statement, but it's not an example of a bias.

Question 3

Which of the following is an example of a false dilemma? A) We can either invest in renewable energy or continue to rely on fossil fuels. B) We can either increase taxes or cut public services. C) We can either support the new policy or oppose it. D) We can either invest in education or invest in healthcare.

Options

A) We can either invest in renewable energy or continue to rely on fossil fuels. B) We can either increase taxes or cut public services. C) We can either support the new policy or oppose it. D) We can either invest in education or invest in healthcare.

Correct Answer

A) We can either invest in renewable energy or continue to rely on fossil fuels.

Explanation

The correct answer is A) We can either invest in renewable energy or continue to rely on fossil fuels. This is an example of a false dilemma.

Why the Distractors Are Tempting

B) We can either increase taxes or cut public services is a true statement, but it's not an example of a false dilemma. C) We can either support the new policy or oppose it is a true statement, but it's not an example of a false dilemma. D) We can either invest in education or invest in healthcare is a true statement, but it's not an example of a false dilemma.

30-Second Cheat Sheet

  • The burden of proof: The person making a claim or argument must provide evidence to support it.
  • The fallacy of assumption: Assuming a fact without evidence.
  • The fallacy of ad hominem: Attacking the person making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself.
  • The fallacy of straw man: Misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack.
  • Signal words: Words or phrases that indicate the presence of a logical fallacy or bias.
  • Bias: A preconceived opinion or attitude that influences your interpretation of information.

Learning Path

  1. Beginner foundation: Understand the basics of critical thinking, argumentation theory, and rhetoric.
  2. Core rules: Learn the rules of logical fallacies, biases, and credibility.
  3. Practice: Practice identifying and analyzing logical fallacies, biases, and credibility in various texts.
  4. Timed drills: Practice timed drills to improve your speed and accuracy.
  5. Mock tests: Take mock tests to simulate the exam experience and identify areas for improvement.

Related Topics

  • Critical Thinking: The ability to analyze and evaluate information objectively.
  • Argumentation Theory: The study of the structure and validity of arguments.
  • Rhetoric: The art of using language effectively to persuade or convince others.
  • Evaluating Evidence: The process of analyzing and assessing the validity and reliability of evidence.
  • Credibility: The trustworthiness and reliability of a source or argument.