By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.
A Premium Study Guide for Serious GRE Candidates
The GRE tests four core RC question types: Primary Purpose, Function, Strengthen/Weaken, and Author Attitude. These questions assess your ability to extract the big picture, analyze structure, evaluate arguments, and infer tone—skills critical for graduate-level reading. Mastering them can boost your Verbal score by 5–10 points by eliminating careless errors and improving speed.
Example GRE-Style Question:The author’s discussion of the “paradox of choice” (line 12) primarily serves to: (A) refute a common misconception about consumer behavior (B) introduce a key concept that will be challenged later in the passage (C) provide evidence for the claim that decision fatigue is overstated (D) illustrate the psychological mechanisms underlying regret (E) contrast two competing theories of behavioral economics
(Correct answer: B—this is a Function question testing why the author mentions a concept.)
What it is: Asks for the main goal of the passage (e.g., "to argue," "to critique," "to compare").When to use: When the question asks for the overall purpose (e.g., "The primary purpose of the passage is to...").Pro tip: Summarize the passage in one active verb (e.g., "challenge," "describe," "advocate") before looking at answer choices.
What it is: Asks why the author includes a specific detail, example, or paragraph (e.g., "The author mentions X in order to...").When to use: When the question references a specific line, phrase, or paragraph and asks for its role in the argument.Pro tip: Locate the immediate context (1–2 sentences before/after) to determine the author’s intent.
What it is: Asks which new piece of information would make the author’s argument stronger or weaker.When to use: When the question asks, "Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen/weaken the author’s claim?" Pro tip: Identify the core argument first, then evaluate how each answer choice directly impacts it.
What it is: Asks about the author’s tone or stance toward a topic (e.g., "skeptical," "enthusiastic," "neutral").When to use: When the question asks, "The author’s attitude toward X can best be described as..." Pro tip: Look for adjectives, adverbs, and value-laden words (e.g., "unfortunately," "surprisingly," "misguided").
Example Worked Problem:Passage: A historian critiques the traditional view that the Industrial Revolution was purely beneficial, arguing that it also caused severe social dislocation.Question: The primary purpose of the passage is to: (A) defend the Industrial Revolution against modern criticisms (B) argue that the Industrial Revolution had both positive and negative effects (C) prove that economic growth always leads to social harm (D) compare the Industrial Revolution to other historical events (E) advocate for government intervention in industrial development
Solution:1. First/last paragraphs emphasize criticism of the traditional view.2. Summary: "The author challenges the idea that the Industrial Revolution was entirely good, highlighting its negative effects." 3. Match: (B) is the only option that captures both sides of the argument.4. Eliminate: (A) is too one-sided, (C) is extreme, (D) and (E) are off-topic.
Example Worked Problem:Passage: "Some scholars argue that the decline of the Roman Empire was due to internal corruption. However, recent archaeological evidence suggests that external invasions played a larger role." Question: The author mentions "recent archaeological evidence" primarily to: (A) refute the claim that internal corruption caused Rome’s decline (B) introduce a new theory about the fall of Rome (C) provide support for the traditional view of Rome’s decline (D) contrast two competing explanations for a historical event (E) dismiss the importance of internal corruption entirely
Solution:1. Locate: The evidence is used to challenge the traditional view.2. Context: The word "However" signals a contrast.3. Function: The author is presenting an alternative explanation.4. Match: (D) is the best fit—it captures the contrast between two views.
Example Worked Problem:Passage: "Studies show that students who take notes by hand retain information better than those who type. This is likely because handwriting forces students to process and summarize information." Question: Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s argument? (A) Students who type notes tend to write more words than those who handwrite. (B) Some students report that typing notes is less tiring than handwriting. (C) A new study found no difference in retention between handwritten and typed notes when students were given the same amount of time to review. (D) Handwriting notes is more time-consuming than typing. (E) Students who handwrite notes often review them more frequently.
Solution:1. Claim: "Handwriting notes improves retention because it forces processing." 2. Restate: "Handwriting > typing for retention due to deeper processing." 3. Evaluate: - (A) Irrelevant (quantity ≠ retention). - (B) Irrelevant (fatigue ≠ retention). - (C) Weakens—if retention is equal, the "processing" explanation is undermined. - (D) Irrelevant (time ≠ retention). - (E) Strengthens (supports the claim).4. Correct answer: (C).
Example Worked Problem:Passage: "While some economists praise globalization for reducing poverty, others argue that its benefits are unevenly distributed. The data, however, suggests that the gains have been modest at best." Question: The author’s attitude toward globalization can best be described as: (A) enthusiastic (B) neutral (C) skeptical (D) dismissive (E) ambivalent
Solution:1. Tone words: "modest at best" = cautious/skeptical.2. Word choice: "unevenly distributed," "modest" = not fully positive.3. Eliminate: (A) is too positive, (B) is too neutral, (D) is too negative, (E) implies mixed feelings (not quite right).4. Correct answer: (C) skeptical.
Why it happens: Students pick an answer that only covers part of the passage (e.g., focusing on one paragraph instead of the whole).Correct approach: Always summarize the entire passage before choosing an answer.
Why it happens: Students isolate the referenced detail without reading the surrounding sentences.Correct approach: Always read 1–2 sentences before/after the detail to understand its role.
Why it happens: Students pick an answer that restates the passage instead of adding new information.Correct approach: Strengthen/weaken answers must introduce a new fact that impacts the argument.
Why it happens: Students pick overly emotional answers (e.g., "furious," "ecstatic").Correct approach: GRE attitudes are subtle—look for moderate words (e.g., "skeptical," "cautious").
"Too Broad" Answers (Primary Purpose): E.g., "to discuss history" instead of "to critique a historical theory." Avoid: Match the answer to the specific argument, not the general topic.
"Half-Right" Answers (Function): E.g., "to provide evidence" when the detail is actually introducing a counterargument. Avoid: Always ask, "What is the immediate purpose?"
"Irrelevant Strengtheners/Weakeners" (Strengthen/Weaken): E.g., an answer that doesn’t directly impact the core claim. Avoid: Only pick answers that directly address the argument.
"Neutral" as a Default (Author Attitude): E.g., picking "neutral" when the author is clearly skeptical. Avoid: Look for tone words—GRE authors rarely have no opinion.
Passage: A biologist argues that the decline of bee populations is primarily due to pesticide use, citing studies that show a correlation between pesticide exposure and colony collapse. However, she acknowledges that habitat loss may also play a role.Question: The primary purpose of the passage is to: (A) argue that pesticides are the sole cause of bee population decline (B) present evidence that pesticides are a major factor in bee population decline (C) compare the effects of pesticides and habitat loss on bees (D) advocate for stricter regulations on pesticide use (E) refute the claim that habitat loss affects bee populations
Answer: (B) The author presents evidence for pesticides as a major factor, while acknowledging other causes.
Passage: "Some critics argue that renewable energy is too expensive. However, a recent study found that solar power is now cheaper than fossil fuels in many regions." Question: The author mentions the "recent study" primarily to: (A) refute the claim that renewable energy is too expensive (B) introduce a new argument in favor of fossil fuels (C) provide evidence that solar power is the most efficient energy source (D) contrast the cost of solar power with other renewable sources (E) dismiss the importance of cost in energy policy
Answer: (A) The study is used to challenge the critics' claim.
Join 4M+ learners. Unlock unlimited quizzes, wrong-answer tracking, flashcards + reminders, study guides, and 1-on-1 challenges.