By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.
Score Impact: Prime factorization questions appear 4-6 times per GRE/GMAT Quant section. Mastering them can boost your score by 30-50 points—enough to move from the 60th to the 80th percentile.
The exam isn’t testing your ability to factor numbers—it’s testing: 1. Pattern recognition – Can you spot hidden constraints (e.g., "must be divisible by 6")? 2. Efficiency under pressure – Can you factor quickly without brute-force guessing? 3. Logical elimination – Can you rule out wrong answers without full calculations?
If n is a positive integer divisible by 12 and has exactly 3 distinct prime factors, which of the following could be n? (A) 24 (B) 36 (C) 60 (D) 90 (E) 120
Run this process every time:
Note all prime factors, including exponents.
List the required primes.
Add any additional primes from the question (e.g., "exactly 3 distinct primes" → need one more).
Eliminate answers missing required primes.
Cross out options that don’t include all primes from Step 2.
Check the count of distinct primes.
Count primes in remaining options. Eliminate those with too few/many.
Verify exponents (if needed).
If the question specifies exponents (e.g., "at least two 2’s"), check remaining options.
Pick the survivor.
If n is divisible by 30 and has exactly 2 distinct prime factors, which of the following could be n? (A) 15 (B) 30 (C) 60 (D) 90 (E) 120
Step-by-Step: 1. Factor 30: 30 = 2 × 3 × 5 → primes = {2, 3, 5}. 2. Required primes: Must include all of {2, 3, 5} (divisible by 30) but exactly 2 distinct primes → Contradiction! - Wait: The question says "divisible by 30" (3 primes) but "exactly 2 distinct primes" → No solution? - Trap: The question is flawed, but on the exam, re-read carefully. Likely meant "at least 2" or "up to 3." - Assume typo: "exactly 3 distinct primes." 3. Now, options must include {2, 3, 5} and no others. - (A) 15 = 3 × 5 → missing 2 → eliminate. - (B) 30 = 2 × 3 × 5 → 3 primes → keep. - (C) 60 = 2² × 3 × 5 → 3 primes → keep. - (D) 90 = 2 × 3² × 5 → 3 primes → keep. - (E) 120 = 2³ × 3 × 5 → 3 primes → keep. 4. But the question says "exactly 2" → No answer fits. Likely a misprint. If "exactly 3," all except (A) fit. - Answer: (B) 30 (if "exactly 3").
Key Takeaway: Always check for hidden contradictions.
If n is a positive integer divisible by 18 and has exactly 4 distinct prime factors, which of the following could be n? (A) 36 (B) 54 (C) 90 (D) 126 (E) 180
Step-by-Step: 1. Factor 18: 18 = 2 × 3² → primes = {2, 3}. 2. Required primes: Must include {2, 3} + 2 more (since "exactly 4 distinct primes"). 3. Eliminate options missing {2, 3} or with <4 primes: - (A) 36 = 2² × 3² → primes = {2, 3} → only 2 → eliminate. - (B) 54 = 2 × 3³ → primes = {2, 3} → only 2 → eliminate. - (C) 90 = 2 × 3² × 5 → primes = {2, 3, 5} → only 3 → eliminate. - (D) 126 = 2 × 3² × 7 → primes = {2, 3, 7} → only 3 → eliminate. - (E) 180 = 2² × 3² × 5 → primes = {2, 3, 5} → only 3 → eliminate. 4. Trap: All options fail! But the question says "could be n" → implies at least one answer works. - Re-evaluate: Maybe "exactly 4" includes repeated primes? No—distinct means unique. - Alternative: The question might mean "at least 4." Then (D) and (E) have 3, so still no. - Conclusion: Likely a misprint. If "exactly 3," (C), (D), (E) work.
Key Takeaway: If all options seem wrong, recheck the question for misinterpretation.
If n is a positive integer such that n² is divisible by 120 and n has exactly 3 distinct prime factors, which of the following could be n? (A) 30 (B) 60 (C) 90 (D) 120 (E) 180
Step-by-Step: 1. Factor 120: 120 = 2³ × 3 × 5 → primes = {2, 3, 5}. 2. n² divisible by 120 → n must include at least: - 2² (since 2³ in n² requires 2² in n), - 3¹, 5¹. - So n must have primes {2, 3, 5} with exponents ≥ {2, 1, 1}. 3. "Exactly 3 distinct primes" → n must have only {2, 3, 5}. 4. Check options: - (A) 30 = 2 × 3 × 5 → exponents = {1, 1, 1} → 2¹ is insufficient (needs 2²) → eliminate. - (B) 60 = 2² × 3 × 5 → exponents = {2, 1, 1} → fits → keep. - (C) 90 = 2 × 3² × 5 → exponents = {1, 2, 1} → 2¹ insufficient → eliminate. - (D) 120 = 2³ × 3 × 5 → exponents = {3, 1, 1} → fits → keep. - (E) 180 = 2² × 3² × 5 → exponents = {2, 2, 1} → fits → keep. 5. Now, "exactly 3 distinct primes" → all kept options have {2, 3, 5} → no extra primes. 6. Answer: (B), (D), or (E). But the question says "which could be n" → multiple answers possible. - Trap: On the exam, only one answer is correct. Likely (B) is the intended answer (smallest valid n).
Key Takeaway: For n² questions, halve the exponents in the factorization of the given number.
Why it’s wrong: Ignores a hidden constraint (e.g., "divisible by 12" requires 2 and 3).
Extra primes → Has all required primes but adds an extra one.
Why it’s wrong: Violates "exactly X distinct primes."
Incorrect exponents → Has the right primes but wrong powers (e.g., 2¹ instead of 2²).
Why it’s wrong: Fails divisibility (e.g., n² divisible by 120 requires n to have 2²).
Partial factorization → Stops factoring early (e.g., 60 = 6 × 10 → misses 2² × 3 × 5).
Correct approach: Factor until all primes are single-digit (2, 3, 5, 7).
Mistake: Ignoring "distinct" in "distinct prime factors."
Correct approach: Count unique primes only (e.g., 2² × 3² has 2 distinct primes).
Mistake: Misapplying exponents for n² or n³ questions.
Correct approach: For n^k, divide exponents by k (round up).
Mistake: Assuming all options are valid (e.g., "could be n" with no correct answers).
Correct approach: If all options fail, re-read the question carefully.
Mistake: Skipping elimination (e.g., brute-forcing all options).
"Here’s how to crush prime factorization questions in under 90 seconds: 1. Factor the given number—break it into primes like 12 = 2² × 3. 2. List the required primes—if the question says ‘divisible by 12,’ you must have 2 and 3. 3. Eliminate answers missing those primes—cross out anything without 2 or 3. 4. Count distinct primes—if the question says ‘exactly 3,’ toss options with 2 or 4. 5. Check exponents—for n² questions, halve the exponents in the given number. Most wrong answers miss a prime or add an extra one. Stay sharp—eliminate first, then verify. You’ve got this!
Final Tip: Practice with a timer. Prime factorization is about speed + accuracy—train until it’s automatic.
Join 4M+ learners. Unlock unlimited quizzes, wrong-answer tracking, flashcards + reminders, study guides, and 1-on-1 challenges.