By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.
Intermediate – Requires precise recall of dates, treaties, and distinction between annexation policies; often tested through indirect linkages in UPSC.
Trap: Doctrine of Lapse was applied to Awadh – Fact: Awadh was annexed in 1856 on grounds of misgovernance, not Doctrine of Lapse; source: Bipan Chandra, India’s Struggle for Independence. Trap: Subsidiary Alliance was introduced by Lord Cornwallis – Fact: Introduced by Lord Wellesley; Cornwallis is associated with Permanent Settlement (1793); source: NCERT Class 12, Themes in Indian History – Part III. Trap: Battle of Plassey was fought in 1764 – Fact: Plassey was 1757; Buxar was 1764; frequent mix-up in timelines; source: Spectrum’s Modern India. Trap: Tipu Sultan signed Subsidiary Alliance after Third Anglo-Mysore War – Fact: Tipu did not accept Subsidiary Alliance; he signed Treaty of Seringapatam (1792) which imposed war indemnity and territorial cession; alliance terms were rejected; source: NCERT.
Question: The Treaty of Allahabad, signed in 1765, resulted in which of the following? A) British acquisition of Diwani rights in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa B) Recognition of British control over Carnatic C) Cession of Bombay to the British by the Portuguese D) Establishment of British residency in Hyderabad Answer: A Explanation: After the Battle of Buxar, the Treaty of Allahabad granted the British East India Company the diwani (right to collect revenue) in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa by Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II. Why others fail: B refers to later developments; Carnatic control was consolidated after the Carnatic Wars, not by this treaty.
Question: Which of the following states was the first to be annexed by the British under the Doctrine of Lapse? A) Nagpur B) Jhansi C) Satara D) Sambalpur Answer: C Explanation: Satara was the first princely state annexed under the Doctrine of Lapse in 1848 after the death of Raja Pratap Singh without a direct male heir. Why others fail: Jhansi (1853) and Nagpur (1854) were later annexations; Sambalpur was annexed in 1849 but after Satara.
Question: The Subsidiary Alliance system did NOT require an Indian ruler to: A) Disband his standing army B) Accept a British resident at his court C) Pay for the maintenance of British troops D) Surrender all internal administrative powers Answer: D Explanation: The Subsidiary Alliance required acceptance of British troops, payment for their maintenance, and a British resident, but internal administration remained with the ruler. Why others fail: Option A is tempting because rulers had to rely on British forces, but they could maintain limited forces with British permission.
Question: Which one of the following pairs is correctly matched? A) Treaty of Salbai – End of Third Anglo-Mysore War B) Treaty of Seringapatam – 1792 C) Treaty of Amritsar – 1858 D) Treaty of Lahore – 1849 Answer: B Explanation: Treaty of Seringapatam was signed in 1792 after the Third Anglo-Mysore War; it forced Tipu Sultan to cede half his territory. Why others fail: Treaty of Salbai (1782) ended the First Anglo-Maratha War; Treaty of Lahore was 1846, not 1849; Treaty of Amritsar was 1846.
Question: The Battle of Wandiwash (1760) is significant because it: A) Marked the beginning of British territorial control in Bengal B) Led to the end of French political influence in India C) Resulted in the annexation of Punjab D) Established British control over Awadh Answer: B Explanation: The British victory over the French at Wandiwash decisively ended French ambitions in Indian politics, establishing British supremacy. Why others fail: A refers to Battle of Plassey (1757); C and D relate to 19th-century events.
Question: Which of the following was NOT a consequence of the Third Anglo-Maratha War? A) Deposition of Peshwa Baji Rao II B) Annexation of Maratha territories into British India C) Establishment of subsidiary alliances with all Maratha chiefs D) End of the Maratha Confederacy Answer: C Explanation: After the war, the British directly annexed large Maratha territories and deposed the Peshwa; not all Maratha chiefs were placed under subsidiary alliances—some were eliminated. Why others fail: Option C is incorrect because the British did not rely solely on subsidiary alliances; direct annexation was key.
Question: The Doctrine of Lapse was primarily justified by the British on the basis of: A) Divine Right of Kings B) Paramountcy of the British Crown C) Hindu Law of Adoption D) Mughal Succession Practices Answer: B Explanation: The British claimed paramountcy, asserting their supreme authority to decide succession in princely states, overriding local customs. Why others fail: C is tempting as adoption was central, but the British overruled Hindu law citing their political supremacy.
Join 4M+ learners. Unlock unlimited quizzes, wrong-answer tracking, flashcards + reminders, study guides, and 1-on-1 challenges.