By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.
Intermediate – requires understanding of constitutional provisions, interlinkages with parliamentary procedures, and judicial precedents; frequently tested in prelims and mains.
Trap: The President can dismiss a minister independently – Fact: President appoints and dismisses ministers only on advice of Prime Minister (Article 75(2)); President has no discretionary power in ministerial appointments. Trap: Collective responsibility means all ministers must publicly support every decision – Fact: While expected, dissent within Cabinet is permitted until decision is taken; once decided, public opposition requires resignation (e.g., Ashok Gehlot in 1990 on economic reforms). Trap: The Prime Minister must be a member of Lok Sabha – Fact: PM can be from either House; Jawaharlal Nehru (Rajya Sabha, 1952–57), Indira Gandhi (Rajya Sabha, 1966–67), H. D. Deve Gowda (Lok Sabha). Trap: Council of Ministers includes Deputy Prime Minister – Fact: Deputy PM is not a constitutional post; it is a political designation with no special powers (e.g., Sardar Patel, Lal Krishna Advani). Trap: A Minister of State (Independent Charge) is not part of Council of Ministers – Fact: All ministers, including MoS (Independent Charge), are members of Council of Ministers under Article 75.
Question: Which of the following statements best reflects the principle of collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers? A) Each minister is individually responsible to the President for their department. B) The Prime Minister can allocate and reshuffle portfolios at will. C) The Council of Ministers must resign if a no-confidence motion is passed in Lok Sabha. D) Ministers must seek President’s approval before making policy decisions. Answer: C Explanation: Collective responsibility under Article 75(3) means the Council of Ministers stands or falls together; loss of Lok Sabha confidence necessitates resignation. Why others fail: A confuses individual responsibility with constitutional reporting to President, not accountability for survival.
Question: The 91st Constitutional Amendment Act is significant because it: A) Established the National Judicial Appointments Commission. B) Limited the size of Council of Ministers to 15% of Lok Sabha strength. C) Made the advice of Council of Ministers binding on the President. D) Introduced the office of Deputy Prime Minister. Answer: B Explanation: The 91st Amendment (2003) capped ministerial strength at 15% of total Lok Sabha members and strengthened anti-defection law. Why others fail: C refers to 42nd Amendment; A was struck down in 2015; D is not a constitutional office.
Question: Under Article 78 of the Constitution, the Prime Minister is required to communicate to the President: A) All pending court cases involving the Union. B) Decisions of the Council of Ministers relating to administration and legislation. C) Names of candidates for judicial appointments. D) Resignations of Members of Parliament. Answer: B Explanation: Article 78(a) mandates PM to communicate all Council of Ministers’ decisions to President on administration and legislation. Why others fail: B is directly from Constitution; others are procedural but not under Article 78.
Question: Which of the following mechanisms ensures individual ministerial accountability in the Indian Parliament? A) Calling Attention Motion B) Adjournment Motion C) No-Confidence Motion D) Censure Motion Answer: D Explanation: A Censure Motion criticizes a specific policy or action of a minister; if passed, the minister is expected to resign. Why others fail: C targets entire Council; B leads to adjournment but not resignation; A is for urgent matters without censure.
Question: The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) is: A) A constitutional body established under Article 77. B) A statutory body created by an Act of Parliament. C) An administrative unit under the Cabinet Secretariat. D) A non-constitutional, non-statutory entity aiding the PM. Answer: D Explanation: PMO is not mentioned in Constitution; it evolved as an informal secretariat to assist PM in coordination and monitoring. Why others fail: A and B are incorrect as PMO lacks constitutional or statutory basis; C understates its autonomous role.
Question: Which of the following is NOT a function of the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC)? A) Appointment of Chiefs of Armed Forces B) Appointment of Chairperson of NITI Aayog C) Appointment of Secretary to the Government of India D) Appointment of Chief Election Commissioner Answer: D Explanation: ACC, chaired by PM, appoints top civil and military officials; CEC is appointed by President on advice of PM and Union Cabinet, but not via ACC. Why others fail: D is correct; CEC appointment is executive decision but not ACC’s formal function.
Question: The Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajiv Kumar (2022) ruled that: A) PM cannot be questioned in Parliament. B) PMO is subject to the Right to Information Act. C) President can override PM’s advice in national interest. D) Council of Ministers must include members from both Houses. Answer: B Explanation: The Court held PMO is a public authority under RTI Act, reinforcing transparency and accountability. Why others fail: A contradicts parliamentary privilege; C violates constitutional convention; D is not mandatory.
Join 4M+ learners. Unlock unlimited quizzes, wrong-answer tracking, flashcards + reminders, study guides, and 1-on-1 challenges.