By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.
Intermediate – Requires integration of constitutional provisions, tribunal mechanisms, and evolving fiscal federalism; moderate frequency in prelims and mains.
Trap: River water dispute tribunals can be appealed in the Supreme Court – Fact: Article 262 and ISRWD Act, 1956 bar SC jurisdiction; tribunal awards are final and binding (e.g., Cauvery Tribunal award, 2007). Trap: GST Council decisions are binding on states by majority vote – Fact: GST Council operates by consensus and 3/4th majority; but implementation depends on state legislatures enacting laws (e.g., state GST Acts). Trap: Inter-State Council is a constitutional body – Fact: It is statutory, established by presidential order under Article 263; not a permanent constitutional institution like Parliament. Trap: Article 3 allows Parliament to change state boundaries without consulting the state – Fact: President must refer bill to state legislature for views (e.g., Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014), though not binding.
Question: Which of the following is NOT a feature of the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956? A) It empowers the Central Government to set up tribunals. B) Tribunal awards are enforceable as decrees of the Supreme Court. C) Appeals against tribunal awards lie directly to the Supreme Court. D) The Act was enacted under the provisions of Article 262 of the Constitution. Answer: C Explanation: Article 262 and the ISRWD Act, 1956 bar jurisdiction of the Supreme Court; no appeal lies against tribunal awards. Why others fail: Option D is correct as Article 262 is the constitutional basis; C is factually false and hence the correct answer.
Question: The GST Council is established under which constitutional provision? A) Article 246A B) Article 269A C) Article 279 D) Article 279A Answer: D Explanation: Article 279A was inserted by the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2016, specifically to establish the GST Council. Why others fail: Article 246A deals with legislative power on GST, not institutional structure; hence A is tempting but incorrect.
Question: The Vansadhara River Water Disputes Tribunal delivered its final award in 2017. Which two states were involved? A) Karnataka and Tamil Nadu B) Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu C) Andhra Pradesh and Odisha D) Telangana and Maharashtra Answer: C Explanation: The Vansadhara dispute is between Andhra Pradesh and Odisha; tribunal constituted in 2010, award in 2017. Why others fail: Option A refers to Cauvery dispute; common confusion due to multiple southern river disputes.
Question: Which of the following is correct regarding the River Boards Act, 1948? A) It has been used to resolve the Cauvery dispute. B) It provides for permanent tribunals for river disputes. C) It has never been implemented by the Central Government. D) It was enacted under Article 3 of the Constitution. Answer: C Explanation: Despite being enacted in 1948, the River Boards Act has never been operationalized; river disputes are resolved via ISRWD Act, 1956. Why others fail: Option A is false as Cauvery was resolved via tribunal under ISRWD Act; common mix-up.
Question: The Punchhi Commission was related to: A) Centre-State relations B) Fiscal federalism C) Inter-State migration D) Border disputes Answer: A Explanation: The Punchhi Commission (2010) was set up to review Centre-State relations and recommend institutional mechanisms like strengthening the Inter-State Council. Why others fail: Option B is tempting due to GST context, but the commission’s mandate was broader federal structure.
Question: Under the Indus Waters Treaty, 1960, which rivers are allocated fully to India? A) Indus, Jhelum, Chenab B) Sutlej, Beas, Ravi C) Ravi, Chenab, Jhelum D) Sutlej, Indus, Beas Answer: B Explanation: The treaty allocates the eastern rivers—Sutlej, Beas, Ravi—to India; western rivers to Pakistan. Why others fail: Option D includes Indus, which is allocated to Pakistan; common confusion due to river geography.
Question: Which of the following is NOT a function of the GST Council? A) Recommending taxes to be subsumed under GST B) Deciding on exemption limits C) Resolving inter-state boundary disputes D) Framing model GST laws Answer: C Explanation: Inter-state boundary disputes are resolved via constitutional mechanisms (Article 263) or tribunals, not GST Council. Why others fail: Option A and B are actual functions; C is unrelated but may be confused due to "inter-state" term.
Join 4M+ learners. Unlock unlimited quizzes, wrong-answer tracking, flashcards + reminders, study guides, and 1-on-1 challenges.