Fatskills
Practice. Master. Repeat.
Study Guide: UPSC Mains Answer: Discuss the desirability of greater representation to women in the higher judiciary to ensure diversity, equity and inclusiveness.
Source: https://www.fatskills.com/upsc-mains-answers/chapter/discuss-the-desirability-of-greater-representation-to-women-in-the-higher-judiciary-to-ensure-divers

UPSC Mains Answer: Discuss the desirability of greater representation to women in the higher judiciary to ensure diversity, equity and inclusiveness.

By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.

⏱️ ~2 min read

Difficulty Level: Medium

Sub-category: Polity and Governance (Judiciary and Constitutional Provisions)


Introduction

The higher judiciary in India, comprising the Supreme Court and High Courts, plays a pivotal role in interpreting the Constitution and safeguarding fundamental rights. However, its composition has historically been skewed, with minimal representation of women. Greater female representation in the higher judiciary is not merely a matter of equity but a constitutional imperative to ensure diversity, inclusiveness, and a more empathetic judicial system.

Body

Diversity and Inclusiveness

Women constitute nearly half of India’s population, yet their representation in the higher judiciary remains abysmally low—less than 10% in the Supreme Court and around 11% in High Courts. Diversity in the judiciary enhances public trust, as varied perspectives lead to more balanced and nuanced judgments, particularly in cases involving gender-based violence, family law, and social justice. For instance, the Vishaka guidelines on sexual harassment at the workplace emerged from a bench with female representation, underscoring the need for diverse judicial voices.

Equity and Constitutional Mandate

Article 14 of the Constitution guarantees equality before the law, while Article 15(3) empowers the state to make special provisions for women. Greater representation aligns with these principles, ensuring that the judiciary reflects the society it serves. Countries like the UK and South Africa have adopted gender-sensitive judicial appointments, resulting in more inclusive legal frameworks. India must emulate such models to bridge the gender gap.

Challenges and Way Forward

Structural barriers, including patriarchal mindsets, lack of mentorship, and opaque collegium systems, hinder women’s entry into the higher judiciary. To address this, the government and judiciary must implement targeted measures such as reservation in judicial appointments, transparent selection processes, and mentorship programs for female lawyers. Additionally, sensitizing the legal fraternity about unconscious biases can foster a more inclusive environment.

Conclusion

Greater representation of women in the higher judiciary is essential to uphold the principles of diversity, equity, and inclusiveness. It not only strengthens the legitimacy of the judiciary but also ensures that justice is delivered with empathy and fairness. Proactive steps, including policy reforms and cultural shifts, are imperative to achieve this goal and align India’s judiciary with its constitutional ideals.



ADVERTISEMENT