Fatskills
Practice. Master. Repeat.
Study Guide: UPSC Mains Answer: The persisting drives of the Government for development of large industries in backward areas have resulted in isolating the tribal population and the farmers who facæ multiple displacements. With Malkangiri and Naxalban foci, discuss the corrective strategies needed to win the Le
Source: https://www.fatskills.com/upsc-mains-answers/chapter/the-persisting-drives-of-the-government-for-development-of-large-industries-in-backward-areas-have-r

UPSC Mains Answer: The persisting drives of the Government for development of large industries in backward areas have resulted in isolating the tribal population and the farmers who facæ multiple displacements. With Malkangiri and Naxalban foci, discuss the corrective strategies needed to win the Le

By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.

⏱️ ~2 min read

Difficulty Level: Hard

Sub-category: Internal Security (Post-Independence Consolidation)


Introduction

Left Wing Extremism (LWE) in regions like Malkangiri and Naxalbari stems from historical marginalization of tribal populations and farmers, exacerbated by top-down industrialization policies. Displacement, loss of livelihoods, and alienation from mainstream development have fueled resentment, creating fertile ground for extremist ideologies. Addressing this requires a multi-pronged, inclusive strategy that balances industrial growth with social justice.

Body

historical_context: Post-independence, India’s focus on large-scale industries in backward areas often disregarded tribal land rights and agrarian livelihoods. The Fifth Schedule and PESA Act (1996) were designed to protect tribal autonomy, but weak implementation led to repeated displacements, as seen in Malkangiri (Odisha) and Naxalbari (West Bengal). The LWE movement capitalized on this discontent, portraying the state as exploitative.

Corrective strategies

point: Participatory Development

Detail

Involve tribal communities in planning and execution of projects through Gram Sabhas, ensuring consent under PESA and FRA (2006). For example, Odisha’s Kalahandi model demonstrates how community-led forest management can reduce alienation.

Point

Land and Livelihood Rehabilitation

Detail

Strict enforcement of the Land Acquisition Act (2013) with fair compensation and skill-based rehabilitation. Chhattisgarh’s Bastar initiative, which provided alternative livelihoods to displaced farmers, offers a replicable framework.

Point

Infrastructure and Governance

Detail

Prioritize basic amenities (healthcare, education, roads) in LWE-affected areas. The ‘Aspirational Districts Programme’ has shown success in bridging gaps through targeted interventions.

Point

Security with Human Rights

Detail

Counter-insurgency operations must adhere to the Supreme Court’s guidelines (e.g., Salwa Judum case) to avoid alienating locals. Andhra Pradesh’s ‘Greyhounds’ model combined military action with socio-economic outreach.

Point

Political Inclusion

Detail

Empower tribal leaders through decentralized governance (Panchayati Raj) and reservations in local bodies. Jharkhand’s experience highlights how political representation can reduce extremist influence.

Conclusion

Winning back LWE-affected citizens demands a shift from ‘development vs. displacement’ to ‘development with dignity.’ By integrating tribal rights, participatory governance, and equitable growth, the state can dismantle the ideological appeal of extremism and foster inclusive progress. The success of such strategies hinges on sustained political will and grassroots engagement.



ADVERTISEMENT