Fatskills
Practice. Master. Repeat.
Study Guide: UPSC Mains Answer: The frequency of earthquakes appears to have increased in the Indian subcontinent. However, India's preparedness for mitigating their impact has significant gaps. Discuss various aspects.
Source: https://www.fatskills.com/upsc-mains-answers/chapter/the-frequency-of-earthquakes-appears-to-have-increased-in-the-indian-subcontinent-however-india-s-pr

UPSC Mains Answer: The frequency of earthquakes appears to have increased in the Indian subcontinent. However, India's preparedness for mitigating their impact has significant gaps. Discuss various aspects.

By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.

⏱️ ~2 min read

Difficulty Level: Hard

Sub-category: Disaster Management (GS-III: Disaster and Disaster Management)


The Indian subcontinent, situated at the convergence of the Indian and Eurasian tectonic plates, has witnessed a perceived rise in earthquake frequency due to heightened seismic activity along fault lines such as the Himalayan arc, the Indo-Gangetic plains, and the Andaman-Sumatra region. While scientific consensus attributes this to natural tectonic processes rather than an absolute increase, India's preparedness for mitigating earthquake impacts remains alarmingly inadequate across multiple dimensions.
First, infrastructural vulnerability persists due to non-compliance with seismic building codes (e.g., Bureau of Indian Standards IS 1893). Urban centers like Delhi and Guwahati, located in high-risk zones (IV and V), exhibit rampant unauthorized construction, exacerbating risks. Second, institutional gaps plague disaster management frameworks. Despite the Disaster Management Act (2005) and the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), coordination between central agencies (e.g., NDMA), state bodies, and local governments remains fragmented, delaying response efforts. Third, public awareness and preparedness are critically low. Mock drills and community training programs, though mandated, are sporadically implemented, leaving populations ill-equipped for evacuation and first aid. Fourth, technological and scientific limitations hinder early warning systems. While initiatives like the Indian Tsunami Early Warning Centre exist, real-time seismic monitoring and dissemination of alerts remain inconsistent, particularly in rural areas.
To bridge these gaps, India must prioritize retrofitting critical infrastructure, enforcing stringent building regulations, and investing in AI-driven predictive modeling. Strengthening inter-agency collaboration and launching nationwide awareness campaigns are equally vital. A multi-stakeholder approach, integrating government, civil society, and private sector expertise, is essential to transform India’s reactive disaster response into a proactive, resilient framework. Only then can the subcontinent mitigate the devastating human and economic toll of future seismic events.


ADVERTISEMENT