UPSC Mains Answer: The Central Government frequently complains on the poor performance of the State Governments in eradicating suffering of the vulnerable sections of the society. Restructuring of Centrally sponsored schemes across the sectors for ameliorating the cause of vulnerable sections of pop

Difficulty Level: Medium

Pre-requisite: Foundational understanding of India’s federal structure, the evolution of Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSSs) since the 1960s, and key constitutional provisions such as Article 282 (grants-in-aid) and the role of the Finance Commission in fiscal devolution

Sub-category: Governance, Constitution, and Social Justice (Post-Independence Consolidation)

---

The persistent suffering of vulnerable sections—Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, women, children, and the poor—remains a critical challenge in India’s socio-economic landscape. While the Central Government often attributes the failure to eradicate this suffering to poor performance by State Governments, the issue is more nuanced and rooted in structural and operational inefficiencies within Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSSs). Historically, CSSs such as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS), and National Health Mission (NHM) were designed to address these vulnerabilities by providing financial and administrative support. However, rigid centralised guidelines, delayed fund disbursement, and lack of contextual flexibility have hindered effective implementation at the grassroots level, leading to suboptimal outcomes and persistent deprivation among target groups.
The recent restructuring of CSSs, particularly through the recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission and the NITI Aayog, aims to empower States by devolving greater fiscal autonomy and decision-making authority. This shift from a 'one-size-fits-all' approach to a more flexible, outcome-based framework is a progressive step. It allows States to tailor interventions according to local needs, improve convergence between schemes, and enhance accountability. For instance, the merger of multiple CSSs into broader umbrella schemes like Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan and Ayushman Bharat has streamlined administration and reduced duplication.
However, challenges persist. Many States lack the institutional capacity, technical expertise, and political will to effectively utilise the increased flexibility. Moreover, the conditional nature of fund transfers and the continued dominance of centralised monitoring mechanisms can undermine the intended devolution. There is also a risk of misallocation or diversion of funds in the absence of robust State-level oversight and community participation.
To truly ameliorate the suffering of vulnerable sections, a balanced approach is essential. The Centre must ensure adequate funding and capacity-building support, while States must demonstrate commitment through transparent governance, participatory planning, and outcome-oriented implementation. Strengthening local institutions, leveraging technology for real-time monitoring, and fostering cooperative federalism are key to transforming the lives of India’s most marginalised populations.