Fatskills
Practice. Master. Repeat.
Study Guide: UPSC Mains Answer: How does the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2020 differ from the existing EIA Notification, 2006?
Source: https://www.fatskills.com/upsc-mains-answers/chapter/how-does-the-draft-environment-impact-assessment-eia-notification-2020-differ-from-the-existing-eia

UPSC Mains Answer: How does the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2020 differ from the existing EIA Notification, 2006?

By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.

⏱️ ~2 min read

Difficulty Level: Medium

Pre-requisite: Understanding of the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) process in India, including its legal framework under the Environment Protection Act, 1986, and the key provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006. Familiarity with environmental governance, public pa

Sub-category: Environment and Ecology (Governance and Regulatory Frameworks)


The draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2020, introduced several contentious changes compared to the EIA Notification, 2006, aimed at streamlining environmental clearance processes but raising concerns over ecological safeguards.
Introduction: The EIA framework in India, governed by the 2006 notification under the Environment Protection Act, 1986, mandates prior environmental clearance for developmental projects. The 2020 draft sought to overhaul this mechanism, sparking debates over its implications for sustainability and public participation.
Key Differences: 1. Post-Facto Clearance: The 2020 draft permits projects operating without prior clearance to apply for approval, a provision absent in the 2006 notification, which strictly required pre-approval.
2. Public Consultation: The 2006 notification mandated public hearings for most projects, while the 2020 draft exempts several categories, including linear projects like highways and pipelines, from this requirement.
3. Validity Period: The 2020 draft extends the validity of environmental clearance for mining projects from 30 to 50 years, compared to the 2006 notification’s shorter duration.
4. Exemptions: The 2020 draft expands the list of projects exempted from EIA, including those in border areas, which were previously subject to scrutiny under the 2006 framework.
5. Monitoring: The 2020 draft reduces the frequency of compliance reports from bi-annual to annual, weakening oversight compared to the 2006 notification.
Conclusion: While the 2020 draft aims to ease regulatory burdens for industries, it dilutes critical environmental safeguards and public accountability mechanisms enshrined in the 2006 notification. Balancing development with ecological conservation remains a pressing challenge for policymakers.


ADVERTISEMENT