Fatskills
Practice. Master. Repeat.
Study Guide: UPSC Mains Answer: Individual Parliamentarian’s role as the national law maker is on a decline, which in turn, has adversely impacted the quality of debates and their outcome. Discuss.
Source: https://www.fatskills.com/upsc-mains-answers/chapter/individual-parliamentarians-role-as-the-national-law-maker-is-on-a-decline-which-in-turn-has-adverse

UPSC Mains Answer: Individual Parliamentarian’s role as the national law maker is on a decline, which in turn, has adversely impacted the quality of debates and their outcome. Discuss.

By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.

⏱️ ~2 min read

Difficulty Level: Hard

Pre-requisite: Foundational understanding of India’s parliamentary system, including: 1. Constitutional Provisions: Articles 79-122 (Parliament’s composition, powers, and procedures), Anti-Defection Law (10th Schedule).
2. Historical Timeline: - 1950s-60s:

Sub-category: Polity and Governance (Post-Independence India)


The role of an individual Parliamentarian as a national lawmaker has witnessed a discernible decline in recent decades, significantly impairing the quality of legislative debates and their outcomes. This trend is rooted in systemic, political, and institutional challenges that have eroded the efficacy of India’s parliamentary democracy.
Historically, Parliament was envisioned as a deliberative body where elected representatives engaged in rigorous debate, scrutinized legislation, and reflected the diverse aspirations of the populace. However, the contemporary scenario reveals a shift toward centralized decision-making, where party whips, coalition compulsions, and executive dominance often override individual Parliamentarian’s autonomy. The anti-defection law, while curbing political instability, has further constrained dissent, reducing lawmakers to mere voting machines rather than independent thinkers. Additionally, the growing influence of money and muscle power in elections has compromised the caliber of representatives, many of whom lack the expertise or inclination to engage in substantive debates.
The decline in parliamentary debates is evident in the rising trend of disruptions, frequent adjournments, and the bypassing of legislative scrutiny through ordinances or voice votes. Key legislations, such as the Aadhaar Act or farm laws, were passed with minimal deliberation, raising concerns about their constitutional validity and societal impact. Furthermore, the marginalization of Private Member’s Bills—once a platform for individual initiative—exemplifies the diminished role of Parliamentarians in shaping laws.
To reverse this trend, structural reforms are imperative. Strengthening parliamentary committees, reducing the rigidity of party whips, and incentivizing constructive debate through institutional recognition can restore the Parliamentarian’s role. Additionally, electoral reforms to ensure the entry of meritorious candidates and public awareness campaigns to highlight the importance of legislative accountability are crucial. A vibrant Parliament, where individual voices contribute to nation-building, is indispensable for a robust democracy.


ADVERTISEMENT