By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.
Difficulty Level: Hard
Sub-category: Indian Polity and Constitution (Fundamental Rights and Judiciary)
Fundamental Rights (FRs) enshrined in Part III of the Indian Constitution guarantee civil liberties to all citizens, ensuring their dignity and freedom. The Supreme Court’s landmark judgement in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs Union of India (2017) elevated the Right to Privacy to the status of a fundamental right under Article 21, redefining the scope of FRs in contemporary India.
Initially, the Supreme Court had a restrictive view of privacy, as seen in MP Sharma (1954) and Kharak Singh (1962), where it denied privacy as a fundamental right. However, judicial activism in cases like Maneka Gandhi (1978) and R. Rajagopal (1994) expanded the interpretation of Article 21, laying the groundwork for the Puttaswamy judgement.
The Puttaswamy verdict unanimously held that privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty (Article 21) and is also protected under other FRs like freedom of expression (Article 19) and equality (Article 14). It emphasized that privacy is not absolute but subject to reasonable restrictions, balancing individual rights with state interests. This judgement has far-reaching implications, including invalidating Aadhaar’s mandatory linkage for welfare schemes (later upheld with safeguards) and strengthening protections against surveillance and data misuse.
The judgement reaffirms that FRs are dynamic and evolve with societal needs. It underscores the judiciary’s role in interpreting constitutional provisions in light of modern challenges like digital privacy, biometric data, and state surveillance. It also reinforces the principle of proportionality, ensuring that state actions do not disproportionately infringe on individual liberties.
The Puttaswamy judgement marks a paradigm shift in the scope of Fundamental Rights, embedding privacy as a cornerstone of constitutional morality. It empowers citizens against arbitrary state action while mandating robust legal frameworks to protect digital rights. As India navigates the complexities of a data-driven world, this verdict serves as a bulwark for individual freedoms, ensuring that the Constitution remains a living document responsive to contemporary realities.
Join 4M+ learners. Unlock unlimited quizzes, wrong-answer tracking, flashcards + reminders, study guides, and 1-on-1 challenges.