Fatskills
Practice. Master. Repeat.
Study Guide: UPSC Mains Answer: Do Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees keep the administration on its toes and inspire reverence for parliamentary control? Evaluate the working of such committees with suitable examples.
Source: https://www.fatskills.com/upsc-mains-answers/chapter/do-department-related-parliamentary-standing-committees-keep-the-administration-on-its-toes-and-insp

UPSC Mains Answer: Do Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees keep the administration on its toes and inspire reverence for parliamentary control? Evaluate the working of such committees with suitable examples.

By Fatskills Exam Guides Team — the exam nerds behind 28,500+ quizzes and 2.1M practice questions across 500+ global exams.

⏱️ ~2 min read

Difficulty Level: Medium

Pre-requisite: Understanding of the Indian parliamentary system, including the roles of the legislature and executive, the concept of separation of powers, and the historical evolution of parliamentary committees in India (e.g., post-1993 reforms that expanded DRPSCs).

Sub-category: Polity and Governance (Parliament and State Legislatures)


Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees (DRPSCs) serve as a vital mechanism of parliamentary oversight, ensuring executive accountability and fostering reverence for legislative control. Established under the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, these committees scrutinize the functioning of ministries, examine budgetary allocations, and evaluate policy implementation, thereby keeping the administration vigilant.
Historically, DRPSCs have played a pivotal role in enhancing transparency and efficiency. For instance, the Standing Committee on Home Affairs exposed lapses in the implementation of the Foreigners Act, leading to corrective measures. Similarly, the Committee on Finance’s scrutiny of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) resulted in amendments to streamline debt resolution. These examples underscore their ability to hold the executive accountable, preventing administrative complacency.
However, the effectiveness of DRPSCs is often constrained by structural limitations. Their recommendations are advisory, not binding, which sometimes dilutes their impact. Additionally, delays in report submissions and limited resources hinder their efficacy. Despite these challenges, DRPSCs remain indispensable in reinforcing parliamentary supremacy. They act as a bridge between the legislature and the executive, ensuring that governance remains responsive to public needs.
To strengthen their role, there is a need for greater autonomy, timely reporting, and binding recommendations on critical issues. By addressing these gaps, DRPSCs can further inspire reverence for parliamentary control and uphold democratic principles.


ADVERTISEMENT